Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread

KingKucci

By KingKucci,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

My halftime thoughts…

nearly impossible to run good O vs a tough Texas D without a functional RB to insert.  You end up with no run game and the on the other end lose a body in pass protection because you can’t ask a random WR to pass pro.   Given that handicap vs that D, Cade is playing okay. 

Clemson got screwed on that pick 6.  21-14 alters the momentum and feel of that game.  Head in front and blew up his front shoulder.  Whoever is the fav isn’t getting that called on them. 

all that said, Clemson lost the ability to tackle and play basic run D weeks ago.   Really miss Venables in these games.   They got the bodies to be way better on D than they are.  It’s the D coach.  Time for change at DC next year.  The calls for that will be loud.  A reminder to SC fans that use that Clemson game they barely won because Sellers broke 198 tackles…..as they boast about how good they would do in the playoffs….Clemson just sucks at tackling.  

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, CRA said:My halftime thoughts…

nearly impossible to run good O vs a tough Texas D without a functional RB to insert.  You end up with no run game and the on the other end lose a body in pass protection because you can’t ask a random WR to pass pro.   Given that handicap vs that D, Cade is playing okay. 

Clemson got screwed on that pick 6.  21-14 alters the momentum and feel of that game.  Head in front and blew up his front shoulder.  Whoever is the fav isn’t getting that called on them. 

all that said, Clemson lost the ability to tackle and play basic run D weeks ago.   Really miss Venables in these games.   They got the bodies to be way better on D than they are.  It’s the D coach.  Time for change at DC next year.  The calls for that will be loud.  A reminder to SC fans that use that Clemson game they barely won because Sellers broke 198 tackles…..as they boast about how good they would do in the playoffs….Clemson just sucks at tackling.  

  

Agree and I am pulling for Clemson here but Texas might have the most talented team in college.  Texas defense is damn near unfair

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I hope CRA is all and well. I tried to warn him what was coming.

Bro, told you all year Clemson was likely the best ACC team (they were) yet not built to run with the top of college football.  They won the ACC.   

me picking them to win today is just being a fan.  Otherwise, why watch if no belief/hope in these moments.  I’ve long said what Clemson was and wasn’t 

We literally are playing a WR at RB tonight lol because of how banged up the backfield is…yet Cade got 2 TDs.  Texas allowed 4 all year.  That’s not bad.  Clemson ain’t got the D this year. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UnluckyforSome Mentor

UnluckyforSome

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Bama Panther said:

Your issue must be with the 12-team format then. As I mentioned, there have been many prior seasons with 3-loss teams in the top 12. If we are going to have a 12-team (or God forbid, 16-team) format going forward, three losses is not a disqualifier. 

The real question we all should be asking is this: should there really be 12 teams in the playoffs? We know that there are at least 2, but I’d venture to guess about 6, teams that truly have no chance at winning this thing and should not be in a conversation about a “National Champion.”

Of course. As originally stated, there is a push to make this akin to the basketball tournament, which it cannot and will not ever be.

I would rather see the old way that everyone thought was unfair, and have bowls and votes after everything was over, than sit through these games that are there to sell me soda, cars and medicines. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...