Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread

KingKucci

By KingKucci,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

SCMunnerlyn1 Mentor

SCMunnerlyn1

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

But what happens when you're in the Mountain West, MAC, AAC, etc. and you think your team is good? You have to play teams in your conference. So it will always be weak. And you can try and schedule as many big dogs as you can ... but will they agree to play you? And just because Missou and Texas AM for example are in the SEC doesn't make them better just because they play big schools each week.

It's an unfixable system until they go to a 16 or 24 team field lol.

They could fix it by leaving 1 or 2 weeks open at the end of a conference schedule and creating something of a play in for the conference title games to kind of force the teams that didn't have to play the good teams to have to. 

 

With these super conferences now it's a necessity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SCMunnerlyn1 Mentor

SCMunnerlyn1

Posted
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

But what are you left arguing for? A Bama team that lost to Vanderbilt and a bad .500 OU team? Ole Miss who lost to a 4-8 UK team? 

SC only lost to ranked teams and hasn't lost since October. 

also everyone and their mother knows LSU didn't count. 

The committee literally passed them over for a team they beat at their home the week before (Clemson) AND the team that team beat easily. (SMU) Makes zero sense. 

Edited by SCMunnerlyn1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

SC only lost to ranked teams and hasn't lost since October. 

also everyone and their mother knows LSU didn't count. 

The committee literally passed them over for a team they beat at their home the week before (Clemson) AND the team that team beat easily. (SMU) Makes zero sense. 

SC literally wasn’t passed over for Clemson.  Clemson was the ACC champ. Clemson got nothing to do with the Gamecocks sad song 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

SC only lost to ranked teams and hasn't lost since October. 

also everyone and their mother knows LSU didn't count. 

The committee literally passed them over for a team they beat at their home the week before (Clemson) AND the team that team beat easily. (SMU) Makes zero sense. 

Oh lord, you're trying to argue for SCar? The team that lost to Bama and Ole Miss? LOL

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SCMunnerlyn1 Mentor

SCMunnerlyn1

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Oh lord, you're trying to argue for SCar? The team that lost to Bama and Ole Miss? LOL

In October back to back with a freshman QB yes. 

and I'm saying with my whole chest they would walk in and roll over half the teams in the playoffs. Since realistically speaking Clemson is 0-3 vs the SEC and they still put them in. 

 

I say that to say Bama and Ole Miss are ALSO better picks than Indiana and SMU but the committee is worried about optics. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SCMunnerlyn1 Mentor

SCMunnerlyn1

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, CRA said:

SC literally wasn’t passed over for Clemson.  Clemson was the ACC champ. Clemson got nothing to do with the Gamecocks sad song 

No they quite literally were passed over for 2 slap dicks from the ACC. Warde Manuel said himself " data points" 

That fat fug.is still mad Clowney killed his running back in the bowl game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
waveslayer Apprentice

waveslayer

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

No they quite literally were passed over for 2 slap dicks from the ACC. Warde Manuel said himself " data points" 

That fat fug.is still mad Clowney killed his running back in the bowl game. 

They where also passed up for a slap dick from the SEC...tenn had the worse lose of the 4 games

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

In October back to back with a freshman QB yes. 

and I'm saying with my whole chest they would walk in and roll over half the teams in the playoffs. Since realistically speaking Clemson is 0-3 vs the SEC and they still put them in. 

 

I say that to say Bama and Ole Miss are ALSO better picks than Indiana and SMU but the committee is worried about optics. 

LOLOLOLOL

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bear Hands
      So is Legette getting traded?

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      Can't keep pining for what never happened....but for god sakes, DeJean, Frazier... and we got this dude in a R1 trade up.  The most notable blunder of this era, that's for sure. 
    • WestPanthers
      a tip of the cap to the Special Juan

      By WestPanthers · Posted

      Thanks !
    • Bear Hands
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      Overall, fine.  Wish we landed a guy to pair with Lloyd but I presume this means they're giving Trevin one final year to put it together (72nd overall 2 years back).  Flashed potential year 1, had a dud last year.   R1: Freeling LT - Great value and a need; landed our new long term LT that could end up starting off the bat.  Icky had a terrible injury and is not playing in his contract year.  Walker is what he is on a 1-year rental, who even knows how he fits. You get premier OTs early if you can find em' and he has what you want.  I thought he could have gone as high as 6/CLE pre-draft, so am a big fan of the selection.  Looking at this class, he's one of the guys at the top that is like "okay that's the LT".  Others have this right/left or G/T type discussion about them.  Freeling is an LT.   R2: Hunter NT - We didn't really have anyone replacing A'Shawn's snaps in our rotation.  Wharton & Brown aren't 3 downers so adding Hunter to the mix fills a big void. I dug deep into S and LB this draft so was a bit to zeroed in - In recognize the value and impact add in the trenches. R3: Brazzell WR - Intriguing.  Given our history, I don't really want to place any expectations here, but a different style weapon for Bryce. I pretty much expect a WR drafted yearly with this regime. Other notables.. Hecht C - These are the type of rounds where starting centers have been found.  We got a starter for this year, but Hecht seems pretty capable and I like it for a long term find.  SOLID AF.  Wheatley S - A pretty well regarded safety prospect.  And we see it every year (like this one) safeties get hyped, people think they may go sooner than expected, and the league reminds them how it rolls.  Plenty of nice safeties have been found in the 4th-6th in recent years.  Big fan of Wheatley. Can't say I know enough about Lee or the others. 
×
×
  • Create New...