Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You should've been watching. Jeanty looked pretty average against a good defense. Even when they put him in to return a kick he barely made it out to the 10 yard line. He looked small out there and while he still looked quick tonight opened up some real questions about his speed. He couldn't beat anyone on PSU's roster to the edge all night.

Cant beat them to the edge and can’t bowl them over.  NFL defenders are bigger stronger and faster than Penn state 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Hopefully the games tomorrow will be more competitive.  Nice slate of games looking forward to it

Yeah, I said last week that I expected tonight's game to continue the trend of uncompetitive games. I think Texas puts it on ASU pretty bad too. Don't be shocked if ND gets their ass kicked too. I expect OSU/Oregon to be a damn good game though.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I watched about 10 minutes of the game last night, seemed more like Boise State blew its chances to win than Penn State dominated.  Hands to the face penalty that cost them a TD and then an ugly interception.  Then a missed relatively easy fg.  

Penn St seemed like a poorly coached team that luckily just had more talent overall to get past them.   I don’t watch a lot of Penn St football so maybe that was just a bad day….but their coaching nor QB impressed.  

Think Boise St had the better coaching and QB play….but just too much of a talent disparity overall on the rosters  

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...