Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With roster turnover a new norm, building chemistry a daily process


Carolina Panthers
 Share

Recommended Posts

Honestly, I love this approach, and I think it is the only right one to take when your team finished as the worst in the league last year. If you are on a poor roster, you should never feel secure. It promotes energy, effort, and focus of all the guys that come in.

And I love that they are bringing in so many different guys to see if they can help us more than just this game or just this year. I never understood why we weren't doing this every year, especially with the practice squad. Get closer looks at guys and you might find someone valuable. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, XClown1986 said:

Honestly, I love this approach, and I think it is the only right one to take when your team finished as the worst in the league last year. If you are on a poor roster, you should never feel secure. It promotes energy, effort, and focus of all the guys that come in.

And I love that they are bringing in so many different guys to see if they can help us more than just this game or just this year. I never understood why we weren't doing this every year, especially with the practice squad. Get closer looks at guys and you might find someone valuable. 

I agree. To find gold you have to shake away all the sand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, XClown1986 said:

Honestly, I love this approach, and I think it is the only right one to take when your team finished as the worst in the league last year. If you are on a poor roster, you should never feel secure. It promotes energy, effort, and focus of all the guys that come in.

And I love that they are bringing in so many different guys to see if they can help us more than just this game or just this year. I never understood why we weren't doing this every year, especially with the practice squad. Get closer looks at guys and you might find someone valuable. 

I get what you are saying but this won’t build a winning team. Drafting well is the only way we get better. That’s it, simple.

Worrying about bringing in some guy to threaten TMJ did nothing to make our WRs better. Picking the right guys, like Creed Humphrey instead of TMJ would. Drafting a guy who works hard even though he knows he’s the starter is fine. Our projects haven’t succeeded because they were pushed  they failed because they weren’t really good enough to start in the NFL.

At the end of the day, guys like Addison, Norwell and maybe Philly are once every few years guys and still don’t make a large enough difference to jump from bad to contending. It makes a nice story but most of the PS/end of the roster guys are going to have no real impact on how good a team we are.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...