Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offensive Line PFF grades


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

That’s not terrible for their ranks either.

We gave him time, OL played well. Diontae and Adam were schemed open. Hell, Sanders, Mingo and Legette created some room at times. 

For at least 3 of the sacks, Bryce had the chance to work presnap and call protections and he just sat and took the snap. 

The QB is not sufficient.

I think Corbett had Hunt help him a few times, one was a sack from a delayed blitz I think. That may have effected it too. Hard to say because I was very well liquored up by kickoff. 

Still it's weird to see after the last few years we have had. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OL looked really good yesterday. We have zero talent at RB I was so against the Brooks pick but I think they knew what they were doing taking him. Will be a new QB that is the best fit for Canales next year so no point repeating anything there. Gotta find the light after yesterday and OL is it 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Canales blamed the coaching staff in the press conference for not giving Bryce more options for protection, said only 1 was Bryce's fault. 

I think we'll start to see that nothing is Bryce's fault as time goes on with Canales. 

Canales isn’t dumb. He isn’t going to dog on the kid to the media, but he is definitely on his ass today in film study 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Waldo said:

I think Corbett had Hunt help him a few times, one was a sack from a delayed blitz I think. That may have effected it too. Hard to say because I was very well liquored up by kickoff. 

Still it's weird to see after the last few years we have had. 

We’re dealing with a newborn and turned it off after 15ish minutes so have only seen through highlights.

Seemed like instances where he needs to make the call or timeout if there’s multiple unblocked defenders staring him right in the face. Don’t know what type of blitz protection we have built into our offense for him to call for but it was there for him to diagnose pre snap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

We’re dealing with a newborn and turned it off after 15ish minutes so have only seen through highlights.

Seemed like instances where he needs to make the call or timeout if there’s multiple unblocked defenders staring him right in the face. Don’t know what type of blitz protection we have built into our offense for him to call for but it was there for him to diagnose pre snap. 

Once he threw the first int from the pocket doing the stuff they worked on all offseason it all went out the window for Young and DC. The Saints picked up on how badly the blitz was being handled and DC didn't adjust because Young sure couldn't. It wasn't until garbage time in the 2nd and when the Saints pulled some starters that they scraped anything together but that was 100% fluff time. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Canales blamed the coaching staff in the press conference for not giving Bryce more options for protection, said only 1 was Bryce's fault. 

I think we'll start to see that nothing is Bryce's fault as time goes on with Canales. 

You can't publicly criticize your QB. They won't do it.

Anything of that nature is a take it with a pound of salt statement.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

The Bryce stans wanted people to believe all 62 sacks last year were on the OL

A lot of them were on Bryce

They were duly informed, plenty. But immediately placed their thumbs in their ears with the hands covering their eyes all the while chanting 'hater', to drown us out. 

Pretty sure Campen was going over people's heads when it kept on happening. It being Young dropping back so that they couldn't stop it. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, NAS said:

image.thumb.png.8dbd7e902b01b13091a06430508cf356.png
 

offensive line was not the issue despite the 4 sacks

If I recall correctly, three (or two?) of those sacks were due to Bryce failing to make the necessary adjustments to protection in order to pick up blitzes, all because he couldn't read the defense at a level expected of a high school quarterback. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Canales isn’t dumb. He isn’t going to dog on the kid to the media, but he is definitely on his ass today in film study 

Nah, my feeling is that Canales already knew Bryce is beyond salvage. He's not gonna waste his saliva and energy on a quarterback who's expected to naturally tank for his replacement. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MRenshaw said:

If I recall correctly, three (or two?) of those sacks were due to Bryce failing to make the necessary adjustments to protection in order to pick up blitzes, all because he couldn't read the defense at a level expected of a high school quarterback. 

Dude is having panic attacks, I don't think his mind can handle processing any information at the line of scrimmage 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did you read my post though, I very clearly pointed out why T-Mac is in a situation that is nothing remotely like those 4 last year, so let's try again.... Malik Nabers had 1,204 yards, the next 3 best pass catchers on that team... Wan'Dale Robinson (699 yards), Darius Slayton (573), Theo Johnson (331) Brian Thomas Jr had 1,282 yards, the next 3... Brenton Strange (411), Parker Washington (390), Christian Kirk (379) Ladd McConkey had 1,149 yards, the next 3... Quentin Johnston (711), Josh Palmer (584), Will Dissly (481) Bowers had 1,194 yards, the next 3... Jacoby Meyers (1,027), Tre Tucker (529), Alexander Mattisdon (294) I'm not going to pretend I'm an expert on the games of all those next 3 players behind rookies, but I don't think it's at all a stretch to say that Thielen, XL, and Coker next year will ALL be better than EVERY player on that list with the possible exception of Jacoby Meyers. If you can't see how having Thielen, XL, and Coker on the team will take more targets from T-Mac than Nabers, BTJ, Ladd, and Bowers had taken from them with the rest of their Top 4 options on their teams, then you're just fooling yourself. Even looking at 2 years ago, Puka was the only rookie to get there, and his next 3 leading receivers were Kupp (737 in 12 games), HIgbee (495), and Atwell (483).  But this was also with the team having 4,300 receiving yards too, and if we have 4,300 yards in the passing game this year, then yes, I don't care what anyone else gets, T-Mac better be getting 1,000 or it will be a bad season for him. If you can't see that putting expectations on T-Mac in a vacuum because of what past rookies have been able to do, without any regard to the players on the team around him, then that's on you, sorry. So for you then, it sounds like you expect those yard to come from Thielen's total and that's what gets T-Mac over the 1k mark, which is a totally fair and valid prediction or expectation. Again, I'm not saying I don't think T-Mac will get to 1,000 yards. I'm saying it's not fair to have that as the EXPECTATION for him going into the season when you look at the offensive talent we have this year. Those are two VERY different things. If you EXPECT XL or Coker to take a step back and not improve this year, or if you EXPECT Thielen to finally lose a step and not come close to the 1k yard mark himself, then yes, I think EXPECTING 1,000 yards from T-Mac is perfectly acceptable in any or all of those situations and I'd then agree with you myself. But I don't expect those things.   I do expect XL and Coker to continue to improve. I do expect Thielen to have one more season of being the same guy he has been for us the last 2 years.  He's averaged 60.3 yards per game in his two years here, which would be a 1,025 yard season in 17 games.   It's going to be VERY hard if not impossible for XL and Coker to improve, Thielen to be the same player for us, and T-Mac get to 1,000 yards all in the same season.  If all 4 of those things happen, then as I've said before, Bryce might be a legitimate MVP contender as it means he's putting up video game like numbers, as it's hard to have 4 WRs who all produce like that in one season. Your argument of T-Mac not getting to 1,000 meaning either he didn't work out or the offense didn't work out, isn't fair, as there is a very real possibility that the offense clicks, all 4 of those WRs work out, and because of it, all 4 of them have suppressed stats this year compared to what they might have been able to put up without one or more of the other guys on the same team.
×
×
  • Create New...