Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dear, Tepper


Buster Bryce
 Share

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Gotta be a @CamWhoaaaCam sock account.

I rarely bring Cam up lol

 

Once again people throwing dirt on my name. All fun n games when the joke is on me. Once I get personal and react then I'm the guy taking everything seriously and getting banned or warned.

 

@LinvilleGorge @rayzor

 

Can I clap back or will I get suspended for people baiting me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Holy poo.

I am actually disappointed at the caliber of this thread knowing that.

I caught him before he went too far off the rails. It was coming. Should have waited just for the entertainment value but I'm trying to figure out how to get home from Florida tomorrow. Flight got cancelled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rayzor said:

I caught him before he went too far off the rails. It was coming. Should have waited just for the entertainment value but I'm trying to figure out how to get home from Florida tomorrow. Flight got cancelled.

Oof. Yeah, I heard that thing is gonna hit Tampa/St. Pete.

Safe travels.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outside of Sarasota right now. Renting a car in the morning. Fortunately it's already reserved.

Not looking forward to the traffic. They already issued the evacuation notice.

My folks will be staying here with my brother and SiL. They've already got everything batted down and are just about ready for it.

Hopefully won't be too bad.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, rayzor said:

Only weak sensitive people retaliate.

You're not weak, are you?

Would you say that weak sensitive rule applies to bullies as well? I tell my 14 year old not to take poo from any bully at school and if physically touched to knock their damn teeth down the back of their throat. Does that mean I gave him weak advice? Am I just too sensitive and weak apparently? We live in a world where sometimes you must retaliate and or make an example out of an asshole or they and their little punk ass friends/followers/teammates will continue to tear down and harm their victims. Sometimes a bully needs to spit their teeth out their mouth to learn a valuable lesson.

Unfortunately it holds true on a playing field as well as there are bullies even between the hash marks. A message board is different I will give you that in that you can't be harmed physically but if a person responsible for retaliation is suspended, I would most definitely suspend someone playing message board bully and baiting as well but unfortunately I realize we live in a society now where the guilty are made excuses for while the victims are penalized when they take up for themselves. It seems like opposite world where good is bad and bad is now considered good. I guess I will just keep being weak and sensitive and enjoy watching a bully spit their teeth out their smug mouths and playing the victim card right after while I relish in a good chuckle at how justice was served.

Edited by Ricky Prickles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ricky Prickles said:

Would you say that weak sensitive rule applies to bullies as well? I tell my 14 year old not to take poo from any bully at school and if physically touched to knock their damn teeth down the back of their throat. Does that mean I gave him weak advice? Am I just too sensitive and weak apparently? We live in a world where sometimes you must retaliate and or make an example out of an asshole or they and their little punk ass friends/followers/teammates will continue to tear down and harm their victims. Sometimes a bully needs to spit their teeth out their mouth to learn a valuable lesson.

Unfortunately it holds true on a playing field as well as there are bullies even between the hash marks. A message board is different I will give you that in that you can't be harmed physically but if a person responsible for retaliation is suspended, I would most definitely suspend someone playing message board bully and baiting as well but unfortunately I realize we live in a society now where the guilty are made excuses for while the victims are penalized when they take up for themselves. It seems like opposite world where good is bad and bad is now considered good. I guess I will just keep being weak and sensitive and enjoy watching a bully spit their teeth out their smug mouths and playing the victim card right after while I relish in a good chuckle at how justice was served.

Go right ahead, but there's a better way to be that doesn't add to the hostility in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different. Because again, I'm not assuming major injuries or games missed when I'm putting expectations out there for the season, I'm assuming good health.  If those other 3 WRs combine to miss a lot of time, then yes, he needs to get to 1k in that scenario.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. Odunze couldn't get there (734 in 17 games) with Moore and Allen there, just as McConkey was able to get there because his competition for targets was Quentin Johnson (711 yards), Josh Palmer (584), and Will Dissly (481) who I think Thielen, XL, and Coker are all better than any of them. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 1,200 combined yards I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...