Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Graziano: Panthers will trade Diontae Johnson

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Cool so instead of scoring 7 we score 0.  We still get a pick and remove a veteran who is setting a terrible example.  You do see him giving up on routes right?  Guess who also has the most INTs when targeted in the league out of WRs?  I will give you a hint, he is a Panthers but not XL, Mingo, or Coker....

Teams are calling for Johnson. Playoff teams at that.

 

We will learn one day about trading away all of our good players. This offense is gonna struggle big time watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

It’s not fun and games.  We are losing every week by 20-30 points.  If we didn’t have Johnson we’d still be losing every week by 20-30 points.  Overpaying Johnson won’t do any more than overpaying Christian Kirk did for Jacksonville.

We trade our actual good players away every year.

 

Y'all will learn if you don't have talent you won't be very good. The sad part is Johnson is gonna ball out like everyone else who leaves the Panthers.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Good point.

 

I keep forgetting we suck so bad that there is no chance that dude wants to stay here.

 

This is what this franchise has become.

It has already been reported he does not want to stay, he visibly quit on the field Sunday and his comments after the game shows that he is going to roll over on his teammates.

Get rid of him. It's a bad enough scenario without any locker room drama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Iceup Collaborator

Iceup

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Sign him long-term.

 

We get a good player and just trade him away to a contender. What are those picks getting us?

i’ve heard he doesn’t want to sign here. If we’re were to resign him we’d have to overpay. It’s something that we seem to always have to do because of the rep and culture of our leadership and FO in recent years. 

It’s another reason we really need to focus on getting the draft right and getting players who can actually help us.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Teams are calling for Johnson. Playoff teams at that.

 

We will learn one day about trading away all of our good players. This offense is gonna struggle big time watch.

They are renting him as a WR2 for the rest of the season. Let’s see what we get in return for him….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • fieryprophet
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By fieryprophet · Posted

      I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • CRA
      Where do you fall on the Bryce Young spectrum?

      By CRA · Posted

      there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • ColumbusCounty
      Defense ranked 10th

      By ColumbusCounty · Posted

      In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...