Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young QB School


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

Good breakdown, probably the most positive of Bryce of all the breakdowns so far, but still pointed out the bad throws/mistakes. He seemed overall super happy and said it multiple times that this is what we were expecting to see more of coming out of Alabama. One game, but definitely a step forward

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, SOJA said:

The bottom line is bryce looks vastly better than weeks 1 and 2 and there is no reason to not play him moving forward. There is no downside. If he starts sucking again we are right back where we are right now. But if he can continue to improve (even if he will never be a top 10 QB) we can build the team around him and bide our time till the right QB becomes available. 

It used to be that way but now days what team is a regular true super bowl contender year in and out that doesn't have a top 10 qb?  You could say Minn i guess but that's just this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

is there a timestamp for that?  I dont have the time to listen to the entire thing

I didn't mark it. He seemed to go by drive if that helps. I honestly didn't realize it was so long as I was so interested in his take on the scheme Canales is running. He seemed to really like it.

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I didn't mark it. He seemed to go by drive if that helps. I honestly didn't realize it was so long as I was so interested in his take on the scheme Canales is running. He seemed to really like it.

found it around the 17 minute mark,  why in the hell didnt bryce lead him?  And the play he does before was a jump ball to sanders who bailed his ass out.   He is still doing that hop poo and throwing off his back foot.  This has to be driving canales crazy

 

at 18 he eyeballs the wr and throws a duck that the corner simply doesnt catch.   I mean if folks want to say this was his best game then fine but holy fug then his body of work looks like a picasso of bad qb play

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

the moore play at 25 he is still bouncing on his toes and makes the throw.  I think I see what DC sees and its just not going to get better

He throws a wobble the next play to sanders

 

I noticed a lot of passes were big time wobblers, I wonder what’s going on for that to happen so much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I mean to be fair the underthrow at the end for the PI won the game so maybe he really is playing 3d chess.  But I know after watching that video Canales is done with his bullshit

Whats crazy is the talking heads on espn, former players no less, loved his game. I don’t understand…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was a pleasant watch, certainly the best game of Bryce's career. JT praised some offensive design, shouted out the rookies making plays, and was just generally positive. There were a few bad throws he pointed out as well so it was more than fair. But seeing Bryce STAND TALL and deliver in the pocket was a massive plus. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...