Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mortensen: Panthers interested in Umenyiora


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Considering the level of talent at WR that has been moved this offseason and what they were traded for, no way I'd give up a 3rd for Osi. 4th or 5th, I'd be all over it, and I wouldn't think the Giants would expect much more than that. That would be an awesome pick-up...

Although I think Charles Johnson getting increased or full-time reps is gonna surprise some people.

This, so you're telling me that with our need at WR we sat around and watched Boldin go for a 3rd and a 4th and Marshall go for a 2nd this year and 2nd next year and now we're gonna trade a 3rd for Osi?

There are some pretty clear signs that Osi may have lost his mojo (funny what happens when you no longer have a future HOF'er on the other end of the line) I can't imagine giving up anything higher than a 4th round pick for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This, so you're telling me that with our need at WR we sat around and watched Boldin go for a 3rd and a 4th and Marshall go for a 2nd this year and 2nd next year and now we're gonna trade a 3rd for Osi?

There are some pretty clear signs that Osi may have lost his mojo (funny what happens when you no longer have a future HOF'er on the other end of the line) I can't imagine giving up anything higher than a 4th round pick for him.

Like Scottie Pippen without Micheal Jordan. Osi to me is washed up. The Giants didn't even have him in a rotation and we want to trade for him? I think Chris Mortensen threw our name into this.

I do find it hard to believe we would not trade for a WR but trade for a overrated DE like Osi.

Go Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what you all are missing is this: The Panthers need help at DE, and Osi, at one point, was a pretty good one. If the price is right (4th or later), I think you almost have to take that deal. He provides another vet on the DL, which is something that all you jokers have been wanting (see all the Grant, Howard, Brown, any other DE that was released threads).

The difference between acquiring Osi and acquiring one of the big name WRs is pretty apparent if you just look at the situation. Osi is no longer in a position to demand a ton of money. All the traded receivers, save Ginn, are getting buttloads of money. See the difference.

So, here you have the Panthers, a team looking to reel back spending a little bit, presented with the possibility of acquiring a DE that can perform at a high level for a mid-round draft pick and not a crap ton of money. Sounds like a good deal if the pick is right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what you all are missing is this: The Panthers need help at DE, and Osi, at one point, was a pretty good one. If the price is right (4th or later), I think you almost have to take that deal. He provides another vet on the DL, which is something that all you jokers have been wanting (see all the Grant, Howard, Brown, any other DE that was released threads).

The difference between acquiring Osi and acquiring one of the big name WRs is pretty apparent if you just look at the situation. Osi is no longer in a position to demand a ton of money. All the traded receivers, save Ginn, are getting buttloads of money. See the difference.

So, here you have the Panthers, a team looking to reel back spending a little bit, presented with the possibility of acquiring a DE that can perform at a high level for a mid-round draft pick and not a crap ton of money. Sounds like a good deal if the pick is right.

I do see your point to an extent. You don't know what Osi will want $$$ wise. You and I agree he is low dollar but does he and his agent feel he is low dollar? I can bet you Giant Fans will think he is worthy of a 1st or 2nd.

I don't agree we necessarily need another DE. Johnson, Brayton, Brown, Taylor and Moore will do well. Adding Osi other than being a vet really doesn't guarantee that our DE's will be any better than what we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do see your point to an extent. You don't know what Osi will want $$$ wise. You and I agree he is low dollar but does he and his agent feel he is low dollar? I can bet you Giant Fans will think he is worthy of a 1st or 2nd.

I don't agree we necessarily need another DE. Johnson, Brayton, Brown, Taylor and Moore will do well. Adding Osi other than being a vet really doesn't guarantee that our DE's will be any better than what we have.

Osi has performed at a level much higher than any of those guys except Brayton. Osi's best performances have even been much better than Tyler's. Johnson and Brown are the only two younger that have shown anything, and those have just been flashes. To insinuate that Osi doesn't increase the overall talent of that group is unreasonable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What has he done since Strahan retired. Not much!!! You could make an argument that he benefitted from the HOF DE. Why do you feel that is so unreasonable. His performance is SOOOO Bad that he wasn't even starting. Barely playing. I feel if he were to come here he won't bring anything to the table that we don't already have. Sorry you don't agree with me but unreasonable IMO is very reasonable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

perhaps he just needs a reset in a new scheme. brayton did it, why can't osi? and if you think about michael strahan... 6'5" 255 lbs... and then think about who'll be playing opposite of osi (at least on half the downs) should he come here... everette brown.. 6'1" 260 lbs. roughly. brown's a high motor, fast off the line kind of guy just like strahan... perhaps Meeks' way of thinking is perhaps if you team these guys up, osi could have the same type of play that he had when strahan was on the opposite side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

perhaps he just needs a reset in a new scheme. brayton did it, why can't osi? and if you think about michael strahan... 6'5" 255 lbs... and then think about who'll be playing opposite of osi (at least on half the downs) should he come here... everette brown.. 6'1" 260 lbs. roughly. brown's a high motor, fast off the line kind of guy just like strahan... perhaps Meeks' way of thinking is perhaps if you team these guys up, osi could have the same type of play that he had when strahan was on the opposite side.

OK OK OK... You make a good point. I have always agreed with bring in players that need a fresh start. Brown and Osi could benefit from each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is just Panthers history pain speaking.
    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
×
×
  • Create New...