Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ja'Tavion Sanders avoids serious injury


ChuckWag78
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Gapanthersfan said:

NFL athletes are just a different breed. My middle aged ass would have been in surgery that night. 
 

Edit: props to Dan for the type of dudes he’s bringing in. 

Yeah. Even if my middle aged ass didn’t require surgery someone would have had to carry me into that building. In my early fifties and  I’m convinced I’ve sustained injuries while sleeping. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Now we know @Panthering is not a doctor. He told us it was for sure a fractured neck smh

 

Good for Sanders for avoiding a major injury.

Spine has some pretty remarkable compressive capacity, we just don’t like it when it’s from the neck down instead of the lumbar spine up. Every time you jump and land for example your spine has a little movement to it, just because of all the other muscles and bones with connections. When it happens from the cervical spine down, the body freaks out and shuts you down for a little bit to make sure you stop whatever fool thing it is you’re doing.

Injuries occur when there’s lateral force or sheer. Sanders landed almost straight down on the crown of his skull. Lots of force but set up in the way the body is designed to handle. Luckily.

its one of the reasons memorable spinal injuries sometimes looks insignificant. Force isn’t as important as angle. 

  • Pie 8
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Spine has some pretty remarkable compressive capacity, we just don’t like it when it’s from the neck down instead of the lumbar spine up. Every time you jump and land for example your spine has a little movement to it, just because of all the other muscles and bones with connections. When it happens from the cervical spine down, the body freaks out and shuts you down for a little bit to make sure you stop whatever fool thing it is you’re doing.

Injuries occur when there’s lateral force or sheer. Sanders landed almost straight down on the crown of his skull. Lots of force but set up in the way the body is designed to handle. Luckily.

its one of the reasons memorable spinal injuries sometimes looks insignificant. Force isn’t as important as angle. 

This is a really good explanation and puts it in good context. Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Carolina Cajun said:

was thinking the same thing, JT is far from finished developing, he needs more development.  If it were year 3 maybe, if it were a vet, sure, but a rookie in first season, nah he needs more reps cuzz dang this class could be special.

I agree he could still develop, but I think that could still be developed in practice. Just after a scary injury like that, I'm nervous to see him get reps in a live game situation when the best possible outcome is nothing more than worsening our draft selection.

That said, I'm 100% not a doctor, so if he's clear to play, he wants to play, and there's no potential of aggravating this injury (which by all accounts it doesn't seem that is the case for this type of injury) then go for it, I guess.

 

But you hit the nail on the head. This draft class is really impressive. I can't remember the last time I was so impressed with a rookie that I'd actually prefer shutting him down. His game is so apparent that he doesn't need to prove anything at this point. Can't remember the last time that happened!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...