Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

XL can’t catch.


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

30 mil sounds about right. Anything over we obviously have to walk away from that. Can't have a WR making 40mil and he's not even a true #1 if we being honest.

The goal would be to get him at around the 25 million a year range like Michael Pittman and Calvin Ridley but with it being on the open market there's going to be some competition that's going to inflate his price. 

I do think he has the talent to be a number 1 just not an elite number 1 but somewhere middle of the pack. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

I think I would if they’d take our 2026 instead of 2025th. Or if they’d send a second and third back for DK and this years first (unless we end up top 5) 

If we trade our 2026 1st for a WR, then we're the dumbest franchise in the history of sports.

Bryce isn't the future, no matter how much some people here want to believe he still has it in him.  If we trade our 1st rounder in a QB loaded draft, for the right to give a $30 million contract to a WR, then we deserve all the bad things that happen to us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jb2288 said:

Holy poo. Thats… a problem. To say the least. 

To be fair, every player needs to sell it. And he probably thought the ball didn't touch the ground because he felt like he had it cradled. But he didn't, it was incomplete, and his career absolutely peaked several weeks ago. He's barreling toward a Mingo/Dwayne Jarrett career with every snap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

If we trade our 2026 1st for a WR, then we're the dumbest franchise in the history of sports.

Bryce isn't the future, no matter how much some people here want to believe he still has it in him.  If we trade our 1st rounder in a QB loaded draft, for the right to give a $30 million contract to a WR, then we deserve all the bad things that happen to us.

Bryce is definitely looking like the future.

 

You might not think he is, but he literally just went toe to toe with arguably the best team in football with a chance to win it. Look at his WRs. We shouldn't have been in that game.

 

Get him a true #1 WR and he's gonna cook.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OneBadCat said:

That’s too far man. He’s overall been a good selection. A rookie season doesn’t define a career. 

He's made some nice plays, no doubt. But he's had so many opportunities and so many colossal, game-costing or drive-killing failures that there's just no reason to consider him anything more than another Marshall, Jarrett, Mingo, etc. Charming accent and hands of stone for a first-round pick.

That's Dan Morgan for ya.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Bryce is definitely looking like the future.

 

You might not think he is, but he literally just went toe to toe with arguably the best team in football with a chance to win it. Look at his WRs. We shouldn't have been in that game.

 

Get him a true #1 WR and he's gonna cook.

In no way shape or form has Bryce shown anything near enough of being a franchise QB to trade away our 2026 1st round pick this offseason, that’s just a flat out stupid take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...