Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Don’t Look Now, but Bryce Young is Closing the Gap on C.J. Stroud"


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Now if you really watched the games last season, you could tell Stroud was in a much better situation with regards to protection, playcalling and receivers. He was throwing to a lot of wide open guys with little to no pressure most times he dropped back.

You’re going to lose 95% of this place right here 

  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, *FreeFua* said:

You’re going to lose 95% of this place right here 

I honestly get the impression that many don't watch other games. They just stat watch. Every time Bryce misses a throw - after making 5 completions in a row, 2 being of high difficulty: he sucks, high school QBs should be able to make that throw. Meanwhile, Josh Allen misses the exact same throw in a game. 

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/14/2024 at 12:23 PM, CamWhoaaCam said:

It's possible we selected the best QB after all. Stroud has looked bad all season.

I still think CJ is better, but Houston might very well David Carr him. That oline is horrendous and with all of the wide receiver injuries they have had this year, receivers aren't getting open quick enough.

I still remember watching that Titans game they lost a few weeks ago and was amazed at the amount of defensive lineman that came free on basic 4 man rushes. I think Tennessee had something like 10 sacks that game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

I still think CJ is better, but Houston might very well David Carr him. That oline is horrendous and with all of the wide receiver injuries they have had this year, receivers aren't getting open quick enough.

I dont' think he's been damaged like that but one thing is clear, don't ever underestimate what constant pressure can do to a young QB.  It's enough if you hesitate for a split second or take your eyes off the field and focus on the pressure to make you miss reads and throws.  The NFL is unforgiveable in that regard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, NAS said:

Nobody said he isn’t because BY got benched for a reason. But the discussion has always been if Bryce is “closing the gap” since he returned as a starter. Legitimate conversation don’t you think? 

There's a difference between closing the gap and claiming they're at the same place, which is clearly what is being meant by posting stats out of context. 

Clearly the gap is closing given the original story is basically arguing that the gap was "may not last in NFL" versus "potentially one of the top players at his position" and regardless of where Stroud is now, Bryce at least will be here next year, so that's a MASSIVE movement on Bryce's part.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

There's a difference between closing the gap and claiming they're at the same place, which is clearly what is being meant by posting stats out of context. 

I never post things without context and have been clear they're not at the same place and Bryce has ways to go.  Go back and read my posts in this thread and stop with the false narrative. 

Edited by NAS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Navy_football said:

Stats don't always tell the story. Stroud has played better than Bryce both years. That is not arguable. Stroud has always had a better supporting cast than Bryce. That really is not arguable either. 

Now if you really watched the games last season, you could tell Stroud was in a much better situation with regards to protection, playcalling and receivers. He was throwing to a lot of wide open guys with little to no pressure most times he dropped back. That gives you the confidence to stand in the pocket and trust your receivers when things get dirty. And those receivers were making big plays after the catch. I don't care what pressure statistics you're looking at, but when I watched the games, Bryce was constantly facing pressure with receivers that couldn't beat their men and playcalling that didn't scheme guys open enough. You had to give him a mulligan after that. And that was as a rookie. So Stroud is facing now what Bryce faced as a rookie with regards to pressure. In his second season, he should be better than rookie Bryce. They have weapons to spare over there in comparison to Carolina. Bryce may have benefited from such a tough rookie season, as he seems to thrive under pressure now. Teams are learning that you can't just blitz him any time you want anymore. He's finding the answers and making you pay. Stroud hasn't quite gotten there but he will. He just hasn't faced it to the degree that Bryce has, until recently. They're both good young QBs right now. Different. But good QBs right now. 

Overall I don't disagree with you. 

But you are downright wrong about Stroud not being pressured on drop backs last year.  He was hurried a lot, hit quite a bit, etc last year. This is per game...

Screenshot_20241227-103823.png.3bf22ee7ca87ef6e9f45f721c13ba890.png

Chart courtesy Icege. To put those numbers in context of how often they dropped back, Bryce was pressured on 24% of his dropbacks last year; Stroud 22%. Bryce is actually being pressured on MORE dropbacks this year than he was last year; 25%. Stroud is at 27%.

Stroud's offensive line was bad, and it was barely above ours last year.  But as you point out, he had a better scheme and weapons (and a defense to lean on). This year, his weapons have missed TONS of time.  The D hasn't been as good. The OL fell even further off a cliff and they didn't invest like we did in OL.

We spend a lot of time talking about supporting cast - let's not forget the OL investment we made for Bryce. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, NAS said:

I never post things without context and have been clear they're not at the same place and Bryce has ways to go.  Go back and read my posts in this thread and stop with the false narrative. 

It's not a false narrative. One poster posted career stats to clearly argue the gap isn't close; you posted their since week 8, then quoted yourself to sum the TDs and just said "context matters." 

If what you meant by that was "Stroud is obviously still ahead but Bryce is playing better", I'd agree with you, but you could see why "12v10" or whatever it was may not convey that, no?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mav1234 said:

Overall I don't disagree with you. 

But you are downright wrong about Stroud not being pressured on drop backs last year.  He was hurried a lot, hit quite a bit, etc last year. This is per game...

Screenshot_20241227-103823.png.3bf22ee7ca87ef6e9f45f721c13ba890.png

Chart courtesy Icege. To put those numbers in context of how often they dropped back, Bryce was pressured on 24% of his dropbacks last year; Stroud 22%. Bryce is actually being pressured on MORE dropbacks this year than he was last year; 25%. Stroud is at 27%.

Stroud's offensive line was bad, and it was barely above ours last year.  But as you point out, he had a better scheme and weapons (and a defense to lean on). This year, his weapons have missed TONS of time.  The D hasn't been as good. The OL fell even further off a cliff and they didn't invest like we did in OL.

We spend a lot of time talking about supporting cast - let's not forget the OL investment we made for Bryce. 

Again, watch a couple of Houston games from last season and tell me what you see. Watch a couple of Carolina games last season and tell me the QB was pressured less than Houston's. Even Dalton's great game against Seattle saw him under constant duress and taking multiple HUGE hits. Don't watch the highlights. Just watch the offensive snaps for both teams. It really wasn't that close. And all pressure isn't the same. Outside pressure that allows you to step up into the pocket is doable. Immediate inside pressure with the outside shrinking on you is not.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Again, watch a couple of Houston games from last season and tell me what you see. Watch a couple of Carolina games last season and tell me the QB was pressured less than Houston's. Even Dalton's great game against Seattle saw him under constant duress and taking multiple HUGE hits. Don't watch the highlights. Just watch the offensive snaps for both teams. It really wasn't that close. And all pressure isn't the same. Outside pressure that allows you to step up into the pocket is doable. Immediate inside pressure with the outside shrinking on you is not.

Oh I'm not saying our OL was better or that our QBs weren't under constant pressure. I watched almost all our games and I watched several Texans games... Their OL was very bad too. The numbers reflect that.  I think that Stroud's decline this year is a reflection of the type of pressures he's taking, the lack of consistency in who he is playing with weapons wise, and a sophomore slump.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Oh I'm not saying our OL was better or that our QBs weren't under constant pressure. I watched almost all our games and I watched several Texans games... Their OL was very bad too. The numbers reflect that.  I think that Stroud's decline this year is a reflection of the type of pressures he's taking, the lack of consistency in who he is playing with weapons wise, and a sophomore slump.

Agree, Houston's oline isn't/wasn't good. I just think Carolina's was a crap show. And Houston's scheme and weapons definitely helped mitigate their bad play. Guards and tackles both getting beat at the snap on the same play in Carolina. Bryce was definitely shell shocked, and rightfully so as a rookie. The FO had to fix that. It wasn't sustainable for any QB long term. CJ is getting a taste of it now due to injuries at the reciever position. But even with Diggs and Dell out, his weapons are still better than Carolina's. CJ will adjust. He's too good not to. But the FO should be a little more intentional with improving the oline. They have an embarrassment of riches at the receiver position. Guys they could sacrifice to improve the oline.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Agree, Houston's oline isn't/wasn't good. I just think Carolina's was a crap show. And Houston's scheme and weapons definitely helped mitigate their bad play. Guards and tackles both getting beat at the snap on the same play in Carolina. Bryce was definitely shell shocked, and rightfully so as a rookie. The FO had to fix that. It wasn't sustainable for any QB long term. CJ is getting a taste of it now due to injuries at the reciever position. But even with Diggs and Dell out, his weapons are still better than Carolina's. CJ will adjust. He's too good not to. But the FO should be a little more intentional with improving the oline. They have an embarrassment of riches at the receiver position. Guys they could sacrifice to improve the oline.

Agreed. Stroud will be fine. He'll adjust.  But their FO NEEDS to prioritize OL this offseason imo.

Been a really terrible year for Houston, injury wise... I think Houston's weapons will be fine (well maybe not Dell from reports 😞 ). Just such a rough year for them. We'll see how next year goes for him.

Hopefully our OL continues its high level play, as it's really helped Bryce adjust to the NFL. I still believe a good OL is a young QBs best weapon.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...