Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Tankathon Approach to the remaining Schedule


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, 45catfan said:

Bad drafting sets up for all kinds of failures.  It makes you go out in FA and overspend, which leads to huge cap numbers, which limits how many other key pieces can brought in to finish the puzzle.  Until we can start drafting better, this team is doomed.  One, maybe two hits in each draft isn't going to cut it.

In fairness, I like Morgan's intent in this past draft--we got a #1 TE in round 4, a solid LB in round 3--the first two rounds were gambles--but if Brooks became solid (comparing him to Jonathan Stewart and Thomas Davis--taking liberties) and if XL works on his hands over the offseason, I think we are going to consider the 2024 draft a success.  And it should be noted that we did not have our first round pick. This draft was purely long term--it told me the plan would be a 2-year process--3 if bryce had not shown signs of life.

XL was the head scratcher--and what bothers me about it--they told him they were picking him and he told the media.  However, if the light comes on, he can become special because he has the tools.   Not sure I want to draft projects early, but we did for the past two years.

I am still not sold on Bryce, but he was putting the ball where it belongs and he is much more confident now. 

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 45catfan said:

If we miss out on T-Mac, take a look at the other Higgins; kid out of Iowa State in the 2nd round.  Same build and everything. Watching highlights, he's the anti-XL...complete hands catcher.  Rarely does the ball get to his body.  I also like Jalen Royals out of Utah State as an inside/slot type.

THAT is what I look for at WR--does the WR extend his hands toward the ball and does the WR catch it without bobble. Secondly, how late does he raise his hands?  I have not yet watched videos on the WRs, so I am getting excited reading this.  I did watch some T-Mac and Luther, and I like them, but I would have 3-4 WRs from last year's class over them both...I think speed is important, but 40 speed is not the gauge--look at the 3 cone--how fast are they exploding after a cut?  etc.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

In fairness, I like Morgan's intent in this past draft--we got a #1 TE in round 4, a solid LB in round 3--the first two rounds were gambles--but if Brooks became solid (comparing him to Jonathan Stewart and Thomas Davis--taking liberties) and if XL works on his hands over the offseason, I think we are going to consider the 2024 draft a success.  And it should be noted that we did not have our first round pick. This draft was purely long term--it told me the plan would be a 2-year process--3 if bryce had not shown signs of life.

XL was the head scratcher--and what bothers me about it--they told him they were picking him and he told the media.  However, if the light comes on, he can become special because he has the tools.   Not sure I want to draft projects early, but we did for the past two years.

I am still not sold on Bryce, but he was putting the ball where it belongs and he is much more confident now. 

I hate it for the kid, but I'm not penciling in Brooks for the future.  If he makes a TD like come back, then great, but there's a real possibility he's never going to be the same.  I like Sanders, but calling him a #1 is a stretch at this point.  He's promising.  I still want to draft a TE or pick up one in FA.  Thankfully, the Ian Thomas experiment has finally run it's course (better have).  Tremble is a TE3, TE2 is his ceiling and he's not there.  I'm in wait and see mode on Wallace.   The results have been mixed.

I did not want XL with that first pick, let alone move up for him.  In a trade back, sure.  I was in the McConkey camp.  How professional scouts and front office personnel overlook the totality of one-year wonders full resume` is mind blowing to me.  XL was so far off the radar until his last season.  Yes, he had a good season stats wise, but watching the tape, his rawness was glaring.  It's like they saw a twitchy, tall and fast WR and glossed over the terrible route running and routine body catches.  It's almost like a badge of honor to mold a raw product.  Screw that, save the energy and take the more polished kid that's a little bit less athletically gifted.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

I’m a huge fan of Tre Harris out of Ole Miss. Size, speed, hands, and great production. If we got him in the 2nd, I’d be ecstatic. Outside of T-Mac, he’s my favorite WR in the draft. 

Convince me to like him too-clear my bias, in other words.  I worry that Ole Miss (and Miami, for that matter) have those high-octane offenses that tend to inflate stats.  Matt Carrol's stats for example.  Miami and Ole Miss had the top 2 offenses in the nation.  I would watch the film on Harris or Xavier xxxxxx from Miami--

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I hate it for the kid, but I'm not penciling in Brooks for the future.  If he makes a TD like come back, then great, but there's a real possibility he's never going to be the same.  I like Sanders, but calling him a #1 is a stretch at this point.  He's promising.  I still want to draft a TE or pick up one in FA.  Thankfully, the Ian Thomas experiment has finally run it's course (better have).  Tremble is a TE3, TE2 is his ceiling and he's not there.  I'm in wait and see mode on Wallace.   The results have been mixed.

I did not want XL with that first pick, let alone move up for him.  In a trade back, sure.  I was in the McConkey camp.  How professional scouts and front office personnel overlook the totality of one-year wonders full resume` is mind blowing to me.  XL was so far off the radar until his last season.  Yes, he had a good season stats wise, but watching the tape, his rawness was glaring.  It's like they saw a twitchy, tall and fast WR and glossed over the terrible route running and routine body catches.  It's almost like a badge of honor to mold a raw product.  Screw that, save the energy and take the more polished kid that's a little bit less athletically gifted.

I think Sanders is OUR #1---and I agree that we need better.  Sanders needs to be a #2. 

I was also a McConkey drum beater. 

When you draft a RB off the operating table in the second round--there is reason to question the decision.  They are found all day on day 3.

Gonna be fun.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Currently at #8 

No, still at 6th

With a loss next week, the lowest we can be is 7th given the SOS's of the teams we're tied with, highest we can get to is 2nd.  Even with a win the most we can fall is likely 9th as (not sure our SOS can rise enough to catch the Saints to fall to 10th)

I think the best outcome for us is we lose along with wins by the Jets, Jags, Giants, and Titans (possible with the Jets getting Miami maybe without Tua and the others playing teams with nothing to play for).  

That puts us 3rd behind the Patriots and Browns with the Raiders behind us at #4.  Then one of the two teams ahead of us fall in love with Hunter and take him, the other trades with the Giants to take a QB.

We are then able to leverage the threat of a trade to someone like the Titans or Jets and get the Raiders to give us their 2026 1st (and maybe more) to swap picks with us so we can still take the player we want and add draft capital at the same time.

Edited by tukafan21
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

No, still at 6th

With a loss next week, the lowest we can be is 7th given the SOS's of the teams we're tied with, highest we can get to is 2nd.  Even with a win the most we can fall is likely 9th as (not sure our SOS can rise enough to catch the Saints to fall to 10th)

I think the best outcome for us is we lose along with wins by the Jets, Jags, Giants, and Titans (possible with the Jets getting Miami maybe without Tua and the others playing teams with nothing to play for).  

That puts us 3rd behind the Patriots and Browns with the Raiders behind us at #4.  Then one of the two teams ahead of us fall in love with Hunter and take him, the other trades with the Giants to take a QB.

We are then able to leverage the threat of a trade to someone like the Titans or Jets and get the Raiders to give us their 2026 1st (and maybe more) to swap picks with us so we can still take the player we want and add draft capital at the same time.

Wonderful explanation, thanks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

That puts us 3rd behind the Patriots and Browns with the Raiders behind us at #4.  Then one of the two teams ahead of us fall in love with Hunter and take him, the other trades with the Giants to take a QB.

We are then able to leverage the threat of a trade to someone like the Titans or Jets and get the Raiders to give us their 2026 1st (and maybe more) to swap picks with us so we can still take the player we want and add draft capital at the same time.

I wouldn't go into this draft thinking we'll be able to make a trade inside the top 10. Recent history is showing that these moves don't really pan out. The 49ers gave up a kings ransom to draft Trey Lance. He couldn't beat out a QB taken in the 7th round. Lance is now buried on the Dallas roster behind 2 other QBs. Moving up to get Bryce didn't exactly put us up over the hump either and we lost our best receiver and draft capital to do so.

I don't see a player in this draft worth giving up a 2026 1st round, and a 2025 2nd round, and possibly a a 2027 2nd round. One of the worst things to happen was the creation of the draft chart. it's way to expensive to make deals at the TOP THE DRAFT. If some idiot GM approaches us with a deal then we should listen. But, I think GMs (especially the ones on bad teams) may start to wise up and just let the chips fall where they may.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

without looking, does Pittsburgh have a reason to play starters?

I don’t know 

And we know Cincy has to win. Denver plays Sunday so Cincy is playing for playoffs 

Cincy beating Pittsburgh will most likely result in our SOS being higher than the Jets (moving us to 7)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PanthersNCSU said:

Really need a 3rd QB to come out of nowhere at the combine and have an Anthony Richardson type rise. Don't think we'll be in a trade down position, but damn it would be nice to move down a couple of spots and grab an extra 2nd rounder at minimum. 

In theory I agree with you. 

Unfortunately, the Carolina Panther draft history in recent years is terrible. I'd be terrified if we got an extra pick in round 2 because I'd be almost willing to bet a month's salary we'd pick the wrong player. I think I'd jump out of my bedroom window if we picked a WR. 🤢

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...