Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

some rando's opinion... Evero *will be* first to be fired


Frank9999
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, TD alt said:

I'd include Xavier Woods...but you don't have to...


Woods is one of the worst culprits on this team.

 

A'Shawn and Jewell are both starters on most squads.   So we are at 4/11.   And one of them has been on IR since week 1.

 

It's a horrible defensive roster.  But Evero's scheme is hot garbage this year and he needs to be allowed the opportunity to succeed elsewhere.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jamos14 said:


Woods is one of the worst culprits on this team.

 

A'Shawn and Jewell are both starters on most squads.   So we are at 4/11.   And one of them has been on IR since week 1.

 

It's a horrible defensive roster.  But Evero's scheme is hot garbage this year and he needs to be allowed the opportunity to succeed elsewhere.

Not quite sure where he currently ranks, but you may be being too hard on him. He's probably middle of the pack. His play has fallen off, but so has the quality of his backfield mates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

Name the players on our defensive roster that would start for other NFL teams. 

I would amend that to which of the players on our roster would start for the majority of the teams in the NFL? That is definitely only Brown and Horn. 

We have a small group that would start for some teams(Jewell, Woods, Clowney, Jackson, etc). That is less about them as players as it is that there are a few other dumpster fire rosters in the NFL too.

It's largely rotational guys and PS players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I would amend that to which of the players on our roster would start for the majority of the teams in the NFL? That is definitely only Brown and Horn. 

We have a small group that would start for some teams(Jewell, Woods, Clowney, Jackson, etc). That is less about them as players as it is that there are a few other dumpster fire rosters in the NFL too.

It's largely rotational guys and PS players.

Almost every D has players at the Jewell/Woods etc level starting... Jackson and Clowney have, at times, been extremely good too imo... The problem is there's nobody other than Horn playing that ever deserves a positive comment like that on our D lol.  Our JAGs are our best players 🥴

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

He got me too not long after that, I complained about him choosing a cheaper material in one of our processes that required twice the amount of labor and pointed out he wasn't actually saving any money by doing it. I got put on an impossible project with ridiculous deadlines not long after that and got the point. 

Luckily, I found a better company after that and then eventually I was my own boss when I started doing my own thing.

I worked for a boss like that once. He was actually a pretty good guy and not a bad boss but he didn't let anyone resign. If you put in your notice he'd terminate you. It was weird but whatever. Then he got mad when someone just up and quit with no notice and we were all like "Bro, you were gonna haul off and fire him on the spot anyway like you always do so why are you mad?" I honestly don't even think it has occured to him up until then. LOL

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I would amend that to which of the players on our roster would start for the majority of the teams in the NFL? That is definitely only Brown and Horn. 

We have a small group that would start for some teams(Jewell, Woods, Clowney, Jackson, etc). That is less about them as players as it is that there are a few other dumpster fire rosters in the NFL too.

It's largely rotational guys and PS players.

Evero may be fired, and I'd be good with that, but some people (NFL types) will say that we did him dirty. The gutting of our defensive personnel---what little quality we had (that strangely I'm having a hard time remembering) was jettisoned outta here in favor of the offense. At least that was the narrative. Perhaps it wasn't that, but the refusal or inability to invest in better players because we were too busy investing in the offense. Now, I'm skeptical of both (offense and defense), and I know you don't even believe Legette will really ever be what he was drafted to be. He certainly didn't have a great season. Though I understood it, I was skeptical of the Brooks pick. I have always been a vocal supporter of Chuba, and I think that I was right. I was also skeptical of the Sanders pick, not because I think that he's bad, but because I didn't see the TE as an important part of Tampa Bay's or the Seahawks' offense, and for all that they use the TE, Tremble would've sufficed. Don't get me wrong, I believe in TEs being a normal part of the offense, but there's no need to spend high draft capital on them if you're not gonna use them to their potential. The way we run our offense, why even spend a high fourth on Sanders when we already had Tremble? I guess what I'm saying is that they didn't use the picks on offense effectively, and that has ultimately left us wanting on offense and desperately needing on defense. Their seeming method---concept---way they went about business last offseason has not beared the fruit that was the expectation. Hell, we don't even know if Bryce is the guy after all that.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TD alt said:

Evero may be fired, and I'd be good with that, but some people (NFL types) will say that we did him dirty. The gutting of our defensive personnel---what little quality we had (that strangely I'm having a hard time remembering) was jettisoned outta here in favor of the offense. At least that was the narrative. Perhaps it wasn't that, but the refusal or inability to invest in better players because we were too busy investing in the offense. Now, I'm skeptical of both (offense and defense), and I know you don't even believe Legette will really ever be what he was drafted to be. He certainly didn't have a great season. Though I understood it, I was skeptical of the Brooks pick. I have always been a vocal supporter of Chuba, and I think that I was right. I was also skeptical of the Sanders pick, not because I think that he's bad, but because I didn't see the TE as an important part of Tampa Bay's or the Seahawks' offense, and for all that they use the TE, Tremble would've sufficed. Don't get me wrong, I believe in TEs being a normal part of the offense, but there's no need to spend high draft capital on them if you're not gonna use them to their potential. The way we run our offense, why even spend a high fourth on Sanders when we already had Tremble? I guess what I'm saying is that they didn't use the picks on offense effectively, and that has ultimately left us wanting on offense and desperately needing on defense. Their seeming method---concept---way they went about business last offseason has not beared the fruit that was the expectation. Hell, we don't even know if Bryce is the guy after all that.

Tremble is just Ian Thomas+, IMO. Classic JAG 

Sanders could be a dude. He looked the part for a chunk of the season, that is for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

Last season didn't help us much this season. They need to go younger.

I generally agree, and I'm all for it, but you can't build Rome in a day (as it seems like we've been saying the last six years now). We're going to have to have some aging vets starting within the youth movement. 

I can't help but think of Jeremy Chinn...seems like he would've been a great box safety (imagine that).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...