Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Way too early mock draft


DaveThePanther2008
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sitting here bored at work and watching these early mock drafts on YouTube so I tried my first one.  Did a couple trades that were offered. 

Traded down one spot with the Jets (7&38) for (6&55) and still got Graham. 

38 Edge  Old Miss Princely Umanmielen

73 Jalen Royals WR Utah St. Tall, fast and a good route runner. 

Thoughts on first try. 

 

 

20250105_101252.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

Copy i really would like to move down if we're not taking TMac or Will Johnson. I think the best of this draft is between picks 10-50 or so. So I would love as many picks in that window as possible 

I've been thinking about this too, and it would hurt not to get a top #5 hopefully generational talent; but I'd love if we could find a Future HOF and another Pro Bowl caliber player by trading back in the first. 

I don't think these prospects will warrant a team desperate to trade up though, I hope I'm wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMG_2062.jpeg.badd0308e81596e5db78ea376b8703b6.jpeg

This is such a weak class

Teams boards are going to be all over the place 

After the first few names come off the board it’s a real crapshoot 

But I still want Luther Burden. I also wouldn’t rule out Malaki Starks for us 

Edited by *FreeFua*
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, *FreeFua* said:

IMG_2062.jpeg.badd0308e81596e5db78ea376b8703b6.jpeg

This is such a weak class

Teams boards are going to be all over the place 

After the first few names come off the board it’s a real crapshoot 

But I still want Luther Burden

I’m always hesitant to buy into analysts saying it is a “weak class” compared to last year. For example, some said the 2017 QB draft class was “weak”, yet we all know who came out of that draft class (Mahomes). Positional depth and strengthens can vary from draft to draft, but there are usually players who prove people wrong and go on to have great careers. So while I respect that some people view this class as “weaker” than last year, I’m sure there are players that can be difference makers and potentially be perennial pro bowlers.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Sitting here bored at work and watching these early mock drafts on YouTube so I tried my first one.  Did a couple trades that were offered. 

Traded down one spot with the Jets (7&38) for (6&55) and still got Graham. 

38 Edge  Old Miss Princely Umanmielen

73 Jalen Royals WR Utah St. Tall, fast and a good route runner. 

Thoughts on first try. 

 

 

20250105_101252.jpg

We need to come out of this draft with at least 1 good offensive weapon and as much defensive help as possible. I'd actually be ok with us not drafting a center this year with this being a weak center class and I feel that both Brady and Mayes both can be decent centers. We also have the option of resigning Corbett who should be pretty cheap considering his recent injury history but before he went down he was actually playing really well in his first year as a full-time center. 

Getting a healthy Derrick Brown back along with Mason Graham, A'shawn Robinson, Jaden Crumedy, and a veteran NT and we could be very nicely set up at Dline next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

IMG_2062.jpeg.badd0308e81596e5db78ea376b8703b6.jpeg

This is such a weak class

Teams boards are going to be all over the place 

After the first few names come off the board it’s a real crapshoot 

But I still want Luther Burden. I also wouldn’t rule out Malaki Starks for us 

Every class that doesn't have elite QB's at the top is always considered weak by the national media. This class has really good depth on the defense side of the ball and at RB. If both Mason Graham and Abdul Carter are gone by our pick I'd try to trade down and get extra picks to address our lack of talent on defense and our overall lack of depth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

IMG_2062.jpeg.badd0308e81596e5db78ea376b8703b6.jpeg

This is such a weak class

Teams boards are going to be all over the place 

After the first few names come off the board it’s a real crapshoot 

But I still want Luther Burden. I also wouldn’t rule out Malaki Starks for us 

The reason I chuckled when we won the Cardinals game and people were bent out of shape that it "ruined" our draft position.  I wouldn't be mad if we traded back, TBH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...