Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Blackhawks 7pm


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

Dude i really don't think you know what a "grade a" is both were soft as crap the first one he's shrinking back into the crease (making himself smaller) and doesn't track the puck at all..... the second he has his pads way out of place and doesn't have his stick flush on the ice these were NOT grade A shots he was squared up with both and poor postistiong screwed him.

You tend to call any goal against the canes a soft goal it seems. A breakaway shot is indeed a grade A chance.

3D733BEA-C0C6-4970-A8A6-D8D48DECF94D.thumb.jpeg.256186434f1bb0c19c2ca60f2c04e0ca.jpeg

Edited by DavidEng
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, PantherChris said:

19 of 20 would be .950 

 

No he's not horrible he's just horribly inconsistent he can make amazing saves and then just complete brain farts....

I expect the dude to save the crazy ones but I also expect him to have at least one controller disconnected goal every game.

He's not great agaist break aways Freddie probably stops both but a minimum of 1. 

Inconsistent is the rub. He has never been able to have stretches of being consistent. He can look like an elite goaltender or Spencer Martin. Sometimes in the same game.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

My man.  Both of Koochies goals weren’t this fault.  Both were 1-0 breakaways that Orlov fuged up. Both of them. Koochie was a wild man but those two weren’t super soft. They were grade A breakaways.  Your koochie hatred is showing right now. 

Today on "Why we don't win shootouts". A goalie that can't stop a  breakaway is crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, PantherChris said:

Dude i really don't think you know what a "grade a" is both were soft as crap the first one he's shrinking back into the crease (making himself smaller) and doesn't track the puck at all..... the second he has his pads way out of place and doesn't have his stick flush on the ice these were NOT grade A shots he was squared up with both and poor postistiong screwed him.

Maybe he could have played it better. But I do indeed know what a grade A is. The other poster just covered it.  To me and the other hockey geeks, Kooch lets in a softy from the blue line or a shot from the far lines with 30 feet to see it. That’s a softy. 1-0 breakaways or “high danger” shots when the shooter gets past the defense and is 5 feet from the net with a wide open space to the goalie.  Those are grade A shots. Both goalies are hard to stop for Igor, Bob, or Vasy. Hell even Freddie. No goalie is perfect on those.   Koochie stopped everything else and we won. That is alllll I care about.  Well and that Moose scored. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, cookinbrak said:

Today on "Why we don't win shootouts". A goalie that can't stop a  breakaway is crap.

Shootouts are probably the most meaningless thing anyways.  Nobody is winning a cup because they were good at shootouts.  I guess it’s possible that your team barely makes the 8 seed because of shootout wins, but it’s pretty marginal.

Honestly regular season OT is trash.  They’re just trying to end the game fast.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Inconsistent is the rub. He has never been able to have stretches of being consistent. He can look like an elite goaltender or Spencer Martin. Sometimes in the same game.

Most frequently...

 

It's possitioning if he was more consistent and in control for the softer shots he would be fantastic... he just plays out of control all the time instead of realizing he doesn't need to go for a flashy save on every shot... just play the angles dude keep the stick in your hand and on the ice.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Maybe he could have played it better. But I do indeed know what a grade A is. The other poster just covered it.  To me and the other hockey geeks, Kooch lets in a softy from the blue line or a shot from the far lines with 30 feet to see it. That’s a softy. 1-0 breakaways or “high danger” shots when the shooter gets past the defense and is 5 feet from the net with a wide open space to the goalie.  Those are grade A shots. Both goalies are hard to stop for Igor, Bob, or Vasy. Hell even Freddie. No goalie is perfect on those.   Koochie stopped everything else and we won. That is alllll I care about.  Well and that Moose scored. 

Okay a breakway is a grade A CHANCE IN my book, but neither of those SHOTS WERE GRADE A even being a breakaway both were easily stop able if he PLAYS more fundemently.... 

You don't shrink on a breakaway (kinda shocked he did not usually his MO)

And you don't have your stick on the ice....

Both could have been extremely routine saves.   

 

I was tired last night but I will concede a break away is a great chance to have a grade A, with the cavite that neither shot was a grade A shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, DavidEng said:

You tend to call any goal against the canes a soft goal it seems. A breakaway shot is indeed a grade A chance.

3D733BEA-C0C6-4970-A8A6-D8D48DECF94D.thumb.jpeg.256186434f1bb0c19c2ca60f2c04e0ca.jpeg

Your right i was tired last night a breakaway is a GRADE A CHANCE, 

I do not however believe those were GRADE A shots.... both were very save able if he's not shrinking into the net or if he has his damn stick on the ice (fundamental goaltending)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

Most frequently...

 

It's possitioning if he was more consistent and in control for the softer shots he would be fantastic... he just plays out of control all the time instead of realizing he doesn't need to go for a flashy save on every shot... just play the angles dude keep the stick in your hand and on the ice.

I mean, part of it is that he is just completely fuging nuts. It's his greatest strength and greatest weakness.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of you are right in some respects. But, while the Bedard goal was indeed a grade A chance, it wasn't that difficult to defend and, to be honest, #52 did every-fugging-thing wrong on that play.

He was back-pedaling into the net, and you can't get to a butterfly when you're skating backward- it's physically impossible. He was worried about the pass- which wasn't happening. Goalie 101: goalie takes the puck, defender takes the trailer in a 2-on-1. His stick was up and that 5-hole was looming exceptionally large and an easy target. Had #52 gone out and remained on top, he would have forced Bedard's shot 3' earlier and maybe even had a chance at a poke-check.

Regardless, even if Bedard missed the entire net, it was beyond horribly played by Kochetkov.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure goalie hasn’t been a strong suit for the team.  But in my opinion it really hasn’t been the reason the team has stalled out in the playoffs.  Our defense is typically good enough to limit grade A chances.  We just need to score frickin goals.

A lot of Stanley cups have been won by goalies that got hot at the right time.  Not necessarily the best goalie.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Sure goalie hasn’t been a strong suit for the team.  But in my opinion it really hasn’t been the reason the team has stalled out in the playoffs.  Our defense is typically good enough to limit grade A chances.  We just need to score frickin goals.

A lot of Stanley cups have been won by goalies that got hot at the right time.  Not necessarily the best goalie.

Every year but two years ago vs Florida in the ECF it has been. We scored at Will AND had great goalie play the 2022-23 playoffs. Scoring just dried up vs florida. All were 1,goal games.  Last year, we had the scoring but rod ran freddie into the ground. AND our PK just poo the bed.  This year, I really hope it’s a 60/40 or 70/30 split between Freddie and koochie. Freddie gets two games koochie gets 1.  Keep him healthy.   The canes will make a deep run if we get scoring and goalie play. 

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...