Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Clausen and the Problem of Picking Second-Round Quarterbacks


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

A couple of weeks ago, Jimmy Clausen waited until well into the second round to hear his name called in the N.F.L. draft, by the Carolina Panthers. With a few exceptions, players selected in the second round are expected to be starters sooner rather than later.

The Panthers probably shouldn’t get their hopes up. Unfortunately, when it comes to quarterbacks, the second round hasn’t provided that type of value

http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/17/clausen-and-the-problem-of-picking-second-round-quarterbacks/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's kind of funny that Clausen was a 2nd round pick with a 1st round grade by everybody in the whole world...except for 31 out of 32 general managers. :(

Regardless of what GMs say, they don't draft BPA but instead for need, especially if a QB is at the top of their draft chart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picking QBs is not an exact science.

However, I would throw a few of those players out of the list:

QC, MT, and PW are all speedy type QBs and not PRO style pocket passers. John Beck was also 22 as a freshman and overdrafted because of his maturity in the college game ala Weinke.

That leaves you Brees, Clemens, Kolb, Stanton, Brohm, and Henne as 2nd round prototypical QBs. I will take my odds out of that group.

Besides, Clausen is going to get to sit his ass on the bench for a few years while MM lights it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of what GMs say, they don't draft BPA but instead for need, especially if a QB is at the top of their draft chart.

I kind of disagree with that. I think that they put together a list of who would be the best players for their teams, in order, and select off that. Naturally, if you're loaded at a position you might list players at that position a little lower as a result. And maybe you might not list them at all.

Case in point: The Cowboy's have a good QB, and therefore didn't list The Golden Calf of Bristol at all and had Clausen fairly low. Had he been around in the third when they selected, they probably would have taken him, but he wasn't worth as much to the Cowboys as he was to the Panthers, who had him much further up on their boards.

So I think GMs do draft BPA, but they have wildly different lists.

And on Clausen, he could be great and I sure hope he is, but if he is he'll be an exception rather than a rule. Which, incidentally, is how all our QBs since Collins have been...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picking QBs is not an exact science.

However, I would throw a few of those players out of the list:

QC, MT, and PW are all speedy type QBs and not PRO style pocket passers. John Beck was also 22 as a freshman and overdrafted because of his maturity in the college game ala Weinke.

That leaves you Brees, Clemens, Kolb, Stanton, Brohm, and Henne as 2nd round prototypical QBs. I will take my odds out of that group.

Besides, Clausen is going to get to sit his ass on the bench for a few years while MM lights it up.

Who the hell is QC and MT?

EDIT: NVM, I read the article. My bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Below is a list all the QB's drafted in the 2nd round for the last 20 years.

1991 - Brett Farve

1991 - Browning Nagle

1992 - Matt Blundin

1992 - Tony Sacca

1995 - Todd Collins

1995 - Kordell Stewart

1996 - Tony Banks

1997 - Jake Plummer

1998 - Charlie Batch

1999 - Shaun King

2001 - Drew Brees

2001 - Quincy Carter

2001 - Marques Tuiasosopo

2006 - Kellen Clemens

2007 - Kevin Kolb

2007 - John Beck

2007 - Drew Stanton

2008 - Brian Brohm

2008 - Chad Henne

2009 - Pat White

2010 - Jimmy Clausen

The 2 best QB's on the list, Farve and Brees, found their success with their 2nd teams, the 3rd Plummer was more successful with his 2nd team.

So far it seems that lightening strikes every 10 years with a great 2nd round QB (Farve in 91, and Brees in 01), so is Clausen a year early, and the next great 2nd round QB will arrive in 2011?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clausen's ability is that of a first rounder. Clausen coming out of college was a better pro prospect than Aaron Rogers of the Packers. The question about Roger's when he was drafted was could he make all the NFL throws which is a big reason why he slipped. That isn't an issue with Clausen.

Clausen spent his college career in a pro-style offense which enabled him to learn how to read coverages. Roger's was in the spread offense in college which doesn't translate to the NFL. We've seen what Rogers has done in the NFL which is pretty good based on what he did last year. If Clausen turns out to be a better player than Aaron Rogers I will be a happy camper!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...