Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Clausen and the Problem of Picking Second-Round Quarterbacks


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

A couple of weeks ago, Jimmy Clausen waited until well into the second round to hear his name called in the N.F.L. draft, by the Carolina Panthers. With a few exceptions, players selected in the second round are expected to be starters sooner rather than later.

The Panthers probably shouldn’t get their hopes up. Unfortunately, when it comes to quarterbacks, the second round hasn’t provided that type of value

http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/17/clausen-and-the-problem-of-picking-second-round-quarterbacks/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's kind of funny that Clausen was a 2nd round pick with a 1st round grade by everybody in the whole world...except for 31 out of 32 general managers. :(

Regardless of what GMs say, they don't draft BPA but instead for need, especially if a QB is at the top of their draft chart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picking QBs is not an exact science.

However, I would throw a few of those players out of the list:

QC, MT, and PW are all speedy type QBs and not PRO style pocket passers. John Beck was also 22 as a freshman and overdrafted because of his maturity in the college game ala Weinke.

That leaves you Brees, Clemens, Kolb, Stanton, Brohm, and Henne as 2nd round prototypical QBs. I will take my odds out of that group.

Besides, Clausen is going to get to sit his ass on the bench for a few years while MM lights it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of what GMs say, they don't draft BPA but instead for need, especially if a QB is at the top of their draft chart.

I kind of disagree with that. I think that they put together a list of who would be the best players for their teams, in order, and select off that. Naturally, if you're loaded at a position you might list players at that position a little lower as a result. And maybe you might not list them at all.

Case in point: The Cowboy's have a good QB, and therefore didn't list The Golden Calf of Bristol at all and had Clausen fairly low. Had he been around in the third when they selected, they probably would have taken him, but he wasn't worth as much to the Cowboys as he was to the Panthers, who had him much further up on their boards.

So I think GMs do draft BPA, but they have wildly different lists.

And on Clausen, he could be great and I sure hope he is, but if he is he'll be an exception rather than a rule. Which, incidentally, is how all our QBs since Collins have been...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picking QBs is not an exact science.

However, I would throw a few of those players out of the list:

QC, MT, and PW are all speedy type QBs and not PRO style pocket passers. John Beck was also 22 as a freshman and overdrafted because of his maturity in the college game ala Weinke.

That leaves you Brees, Clemens, Kolb, Stanton, Brohm, and Henne as 2nd round prototypical QBs. I will take my odds out of that group.

Besides, Clausen is going to get to sit his ass on the bench for a few years while MM lights it up.

Who the hell is QC and MT?

EDIT: NVM, I read the article. My bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Below is a list all the QB's drafted in the 2nd round for the last 20 years.

1991 - Brett Farve

1991 - Browning Nagle

1992 - Matt Blundin

1992 - Tony Sacca

1995 - Todd Collins

1995 - Kordell Stewart

1996 - Tony Banks

1997 - Jake Plummer

1998 - Charlie Batch

1999 - Shaun King

2001 - Drew Brees

2001 - Quincy Carter

2001 - Marques Tuiasosopo

2006 - Kellen Clemens

2007 - Kevin Kolb

2007 - John Beck

2007 - Drew Stanton

2008 - Brian Brohm

2008 - Chad Henne

2009 - Pat White

2010 - Jimmy Clausen

The 2 best QB's on the list, Farve and Brees, found their success with their 2nd teams, the 3rd Plummer was more successful with his 2nd team.

So far it seems that lightening strikes every 10 years with a great 2nd round QB (Farve in 91, and Brees in 01), so is Clausen a year early, and the next great 2nd round QB will arrive in 2011?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clausen's ability is that of a first rounder. Clausen coming out of college was a better pro prospect than Aaron Rogers of the Packers. The question about Roger's when he was drafted was could he make all the NFL throws which is a big reason why he slipped. That isn't an issue with Clausen.

Clausen spent his college career in a pro-style offense which enabled him to learn how to read coverages. Roger's was in the spread offense in college which doesn't translate to the NFL. We've seen what Rogers has done in the NFL which is pretty good based on what he did last year. If Clausen turns out to be a better player than Aaron Rogers I will be a happy camper!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...