Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I am confused


methodtoll

Recommended Posts

Help me out here:

I've seen a lot of articles that state that the reason why Clausen is the perfect fit in Carolina is because he practically ran the same offense with Weis at ND.

If I am not mistaken, didn't Weis run the West Coast Offense at ND and in NE?

So if that was the case and we are practically running the same offense as Weis, are we not running a hybrid version of the WCO?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Help me out here:

I've seen a lot of articles that state that the reason why Clausen is the perfect fit in Carolina is because he practically ran the same offense with Weis at ND.

If I am not mistaken, didn't Weis run the West Coast Offense at ND and in NE?

So if that was the case and we are practically running the same offense as Weis, are we not running a hybrid version of the WCO?

no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we don't run any version of the west coast offense, so no. and bradford is rated above clausen purely based on madden politics

I never said we did run it, I knew we ran a power run game... I just don't get why the media is comparing our offense to Weis's offense when we don't run same offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Help me out here:

I've seen a lot of articles that state that the reason why Clausen is the perfect fit in Carolina is because he practically ran the same offense with Weis at ND.

If I am not mistaken, didn't Weis run the West Coast Offense at ND and in NE?

So if that was the case and we are practically running the same offense as Weis, are we not running a hybrid version of the WCO?

Not even close

Google "Erhart Perkins"

"pass to score, run to win"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i wouldnt mind accually thbrowing a few westcoast style plays in there every once in a while accually. i just think about the philly eagles back a few years ago, and how westbrook looked so good. i think that deangelo could do some of the pass catching, and yards after catch if he were given an oppertunity. also,, throwing stewart and armanti edwards in there could really be interesting.

whether or not we ever do anything like that, our offense will be pretty dyanamic in the next few seasons, granted we resign guys like kahlil and deangelo.

Thats exactly what they were working on in passing camp last week. 4 wide recievers deep and HB screens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wies ran a pro style offense at ND same as they run at Carolina. Pound the run and then pass however the running game was never great there so sometimes they would spread it out. They threw a lot of deep balls down the sidelines Clausen will do great for you guys I am happy to see him go there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A WCO is not synonomous with a 4 wideout receiver formation although most WCO use them. The WCO offense is more a philosophy of how to move the ball. WCOs use short timing passes in place of their running game. Backs are used as often to run short routes in the flats and over the middle as they are to actually run the ball. WCO teams run once they have a lead not to score points like we do.

Here is a decent article written by a Jaguar fan about the possibility of Jacksonville using the Philly style WCO offense. Some good information.

http://www.bigcatcountry.com/2010/6/2/1495432/some-ducks-playbook-andy-reids

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weiss ran a pro-style offense that emphasized the ability to run multiple plays out of a few formations. In other words line up in the same formation 3 times in a row but run 3 different plays. The key is to mix things up and exploit mismatches in the defensive scheme once you get up to the line of scrimmage and see what the defense is doing. There are lots of audibles and multiple plays that can be run out of each look so it requires the quarterback to recognize defensives and adlib as they go. Running is a big part of the offense but so is passing vertically.

Here is a decent summary.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_England_Patriots_strategy#Erhardt_-_Perkins_Offensive_System

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Canales’ recipe for success is simple — slow the game down with long drives that keep the other team’s offense off the field. Long drives are built from short gains but short gains require more 3rd-down conversions.  The Panthers are converting 37.5% of their third downs, which is average but not enough. As a result, they have attempted 21 fourth downs — the most in the NFL — and they’ve converted 71.4% of them, ranking 3rd among teams with at least 15 attempts. The Chiefs are second @ 80% and the Colts are first at 88% but the majority of their conversions are short yardage runs - not passes.  The Panthers have had three big wins this season — against Miami, the Cowboys, and the Packers — those conversions have played a major role in each of those wins. Miami The Panthers trailed by 17 in the 2nd quarter, facing a 4th-and-5 at the Miami 48. Young threw a 21-yard completion and they went on to score 7 on that drive. Then in the 4th, down by 4, they faced another 4th-and-5 at the Miami 33. Young delivered a 17-yard completion for the 1st down and they went on to score the winning TD. Cowboys The game is tied and the Panthers take over at their own 14 with 6 minutes left. Rico picks up 16 yards and Young converts two 3rd downs, gaining 37 yards, but misses on a third conversion. At the Cowboys’ 40, facing a 4th-and-4 at the 2-minute mark — knowing the Cowboys likely score if they get the ball back — Canales has them go for it. Young converts with a 7-yard pass putting them at the 33 in FG range. They then go on to kicj the game winning FG. Packers Young was 2-for-2 on 4th-down attempts. Then on the final drive starting from their own 19 with the score tied, Young converts two 3rd downs for 19 yards and Rico adds another 19 to move them into field-goal range for the win. In total, Bryce went 2-for-4 on 3rd downs and 5-for-5 on 4th downs on critical plays in those games. When the Panthers needed 1 yard against the Packers on their own 41 early in the game, Canales went to Young. - not Rico. When they needed 4 yards to keep the drive going at the 2 minute mark against the Cowboys he went to Young. Those throws weren’t empty-yardage completions; they were high-pressure, must-convert moments that directly contributed to all three wins. I keep reading how the Panthers  are winning in spite of Young, that Canales doesn’t trust him and schemes around him. But these drives show the opposite: when the game is on the line, Canales has consistently put the ball in Young’s hands and Young has consistently produced in those moments.  Some people do well in normal situations but crumble under pressure. Others can be uneven in normal times but produce when the presure is greatest. The question is who would you rather have in the playoffs. More importantly, who do you think Canales and the FO would want?  
    • I think is worse news for Tremayne. They need special teams help with him questionable.  If T-Mac is down, XL, Coker, Horn, and Renfrow. No way Chisena gets meaningful snaps as WR, only on special teams. 
×
×
  • Create New...