Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Zombie tv series coming to AMC


g5jamz

Recommended Posts

Bit off topic. But what was that show that was kinda like the creepshow but lame and cheesy and had this monster family watching TV in the intro...they all had one eye like cyclopes.

What was the name of it? Anyone remember it?

It sounds familiar, but I can't think of it. It's been a while since I saw a lot of one-eyed monsters on TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds familiar, but I can't think of it. It's been a while since I saw a lot of one-eyed monsters on TV.

Yeah...just can't remember the name. But that family was just in the theme intro, first the camera would zoom into the window with this weird music... mom would grab the popcorn and the girl would say, "hey, look what's on TV". Then the show would have 2 episodes of wacky horror stories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah...just can't remember the name. But that family was just in the theme intro, first the camera would zoom into the window with this weird music... mom would grab the popcorn and the girl would say, "hey, look what's on TV". Then the show would have 2 episodes of wacky horror stories.

Monsters?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsters_(TV_series)

The introduction of the show is a perverse take on a sitcom intro which begins with an aerial view of a neighborhood drawing closer to what seems to be merely a typical suburban home. The camera enters this seemingly innocuous setting as the family inside is discussing what to watch on television. They are revealed to be hideous humanoid creatures with an abnormal number of eyes and elongated, deformed faces who snack on candied insects, yet they are all dressed in very human clothing and live with typical affluent suburban surroundings. The mother eyes what is on the television, "It's Monsters, our favorite show!" to which the daughter remarks, "Shh, it's starting...."
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure, there's definitely a chance that a fire sale in 2022 could've paid off but I don't think that's a certainty. It's not just about stockpiling the picks and bettering odds; it's about hitting on those picks, having a stable coaching staff to develop them, and keeping the locker room engaged. We didn't exactly have a model front office nor stable coaching staff in 2022. It's worth noting that part of the reason that DJ had to be included in the trade up for #1 was because the Bears needed an immediate, proven WR1 to help Fields. It was him or another immediate first-round pick, not a future one like what was being offered for Burns (whom teams knew that things were shaky with and that they could afford to wait). As for the Eagles, they recovered because the foundation was already in place. Pederson got flak and was ultimately fired (and was just fired again this offseason from the Jags). Their recovery was quick because the foundation was already in place: Howie Roseman and a solid roster (that included a stacked OL, a second year QB, and a veteran defense). Philly had a margin of error that just wasn't available to Carolina. I'm not against using the draft to rebuild, but a full-on teardown comes with real consequences: fan disengagement, a fractured locker room, poor development, a losing environment... and I don't believe that we had the necessary leadership at the time to cleanly navigate it. That's a gamble that I want no part of.  Now that we do have a staff that seems to be in complete alignment and building for the future rather than fighting for their jobs, I'm more inclined to observe their process and see where it leads rather than backseat driving with "perfect" hindsight. 
    • I see it a bit differently considering there is only 20M in cap space. Given how many of the premium positions are on rookie contracts their cap should not be nearly maxed out. Tillis still has a lot of work to do before these rookies will need a second contract. 
×
×
  • Create New...