Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Betty White has long lost dirty sex photos


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

BETTY White is kinky little devil if this latest report is to be believed!

According to insiders, there’s a small collection of photos which depict the the actress, 88, and her late husband, television host Allen Ludden, engaging in sexual activities.

There are said to be four photos in total. The pics in question, which are reportedly being shopped to various media organizations, were recently found in a box belonging to Betty.

The box was supposedly left behind at her old house along with other memorabilia.

Meanwhile, Betty has insisted she won’t go down the same route as sex tape star Kim Kardashian by becoming a reality TV star.

“I shouldn’t be negative but they [reality TV shows] are not my favorite things in the world,” she said. “I don’t like them.”

http://www.showbizspy.com/article/206526/betty-white-and-late-husband-have-sex-pictures-report.html

tumblr_l16nkzi3f71qbxykyo1_250.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does this remind me of the movie "Airheads"? Where they asked for naked pics of Bea Authur! :eek:

Let's See Alan Lunden has been dead for abour 20 years, and she's 89 now. That would put her at most 69! Still, I don't want to see the pics.

Betty White has a new show on TV Land.

Betty White, other favorites in funny, fresh "Hot in Cleveland"

We must have been having an awful lot of fun. Where did the time go? Jane Leeves, the lovably loopy Daphne from Frasier, is 49. Valerie Bertinelli, the adorable younger sister from One Day at a Time, is 50. Wendie Malick, the boozy fashion editor and former supermodel in Just Shoot Me, turns 60 in December. And Betty White - well, she's always been pretty old, but now she's 88.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He had games where he was a top 10 QB that week, vs Saints, Falcons, Eagles, Chiefs, Bucs.  Amazing performances that I think show what he can do consistently.  
    • We both know there's more that goes into batted passes than just the height of the QB. Most people here have readily acknowledged this and there were numerous discussions about it before we drafted Young. But if you are presenting a POV that Bryce's height hasn't tied to issues with his footwork then there's nothing anyone is going to be able to say to sway you and you know this. Even beyond the footwork I recall a redzone play where Bryce couldn't see around his right tackle at all where a receiver was waiting practically alone in the end zone for a touchdown. There are real world circumstances that are going to show up over the course of the upcoming season and it's up to Bryce and Dave Canales to make adjustments and do anything they can to mitigate negative instances and yes that begins with Bryce's footwork again. Thanks for your time. Have a nice weekend.
    • I'm arguing that should those supposed deficiencies, like height or pocket footwork, be as consequential as you and others have claimed, then there would be a clear, observable impact in the data. That's not unreasonable. For example, batted passes are often used as a size-related concern (see: Baker Mayfield), yet Bryce ranked among the lowest in deflections at the line. If his stature is such a limitation, why isn't it showing up there? Or are you suggesting that's why his passing yards fall short of your expectations? If the latter, I would hope that you're not discounting yards left on the field due to drops (of which he led the league in).  Also, asking for specific, measurable benchmarks isn't aggression... it's accountability. If that feels uncomfortable, it might be worth reflecting on how much of your anti-Bryce argument is grounded in subjective perception rather than objective metrics. So, again: do you have any specific KPIs beyond total passing yardage, height, and weight that you consider relevant to evaluating whether a QB is top-10? If you want to add YPA and passing yards per game to those metrics, that's fair, just be clear about it. But let's not pretend that asking for clarity is some kind of provocation. I'm simply trying to understand the actual criteria... not just the vibes.
×
×
  • Create New...