Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Abdul Carter has a foot "stress reaction" and could potentially need surgery


LinvilleGorge
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

TBH, our history with players WITH an injury history isn't great. People always love to point to the most insane outlier of all time(and should be HOFer) Thomas Davis, but we get way more Brooks than we do TD's.

TBH, aside from that, I would take any of these EDGE/DE guys at #8. Pool is too deep and I am not convinced of how elite Carter is. Look at Burns in college and then Carter. Burns is better, IMO. Better player, better tape, etc. 

Could Carter just have that next gear that Burns never developed? For sure. But I also think everyone is leaning hard into recency bias and thinking, "Oh this is gonna be Micah Parsons!" Are we sure about that? What if he is Yetur Gross-Matos? 

Carter is way more well rounded than Burns ever was. Burns was and is a great speed rusher and he's a good pursuit run defender. But honestly he's subpar everywhere else. Carter has almost as many solo tackles in his college career as Burns had combined tackles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Carter is way more well rounded than Burns ever was. Burns was and is a great speed rusher and he's a good pursuit run defender. But honestly he's subpar everywhere else. Carter has almost as many solo tackles in his college career as Burns had combined tackles.

But Carter also played OLB prior to his move to EDGE.

I don't see him as more well rounded than Burns. He is a poor man's Burns, IMO.

Time will tell. I have been right plenty of times on evals and I have been wrong plenty of times too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

But Carter also played OLB prior to his move to EDGE.

I don't see him as more well rounded than Burns. He is a poor man's Burns, IMO.

Time will tell. I have been right plenty of times on evals and I have been wrong plenty of times too.

There's a reason why Burns was a mid-1st round pick instead of a top 5 lock like Carter. It's because Burns sucked at everything except being faster around the corner than the OT in front of him. He still does. He's really good at the trick tht gets you paid and there were still enough concerns on his overall game for him to fall to the middle of the first. Carter is honestly better at everything coming out of college.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There's a reason why Burns was a mid-1st round pick instead of a top 5 lock like Carter. It's because Burns sucked at everything except being faster around the corner than the OT in front of him. He still does. He's really good at the trick tht gets you paid and there were still enough concerns on his overall game for him to fall to the middle of the first. Carter is honestly better at everything coming out of college.

Well, I don't think Carter is a top 5 lock(TBD). Also, quite a different class of talent in that draft on the surface. 

Do remember this is largely viewed as an extremely weak draft in terms of elite talent. The 2019 draft didn't have that overall view.

Doesn't mean that won't ultimately will prove to be inaccurate, obviously. The 2019 draft first round is fairly solid in hindsight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I hate to break it to the folks stressing about a guy who almost certainly won't be there at #8 potentially not being ready by week 1 but what the fug does it matter? Y'all expecting to win the Super Bowl next year or something? What would a rookie missing a few weeks matter?

Yeah that's not the point. It comes down to losing confidence in the GMs ability to perform a very big part of his job. Draft. Injuries happen in football. But when guys start missing time due to known injuries, that's a problem. 

And how do we know it won't turn into another Horn or Brooks situation? It doesn't have to be Carter. But the first 2 to 3 picks need to be on the field with minimal injury concerns. That wasn't the case last season. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Well, I don't think Carter is a top 5 lock(TBD). Also, quite a different class of talent in that draft on the surface. 

Do remember this is largely viewed as an extremely weak draft in terms of elite talent. The 2019 draft didn't have that overall view.

Doesn't mean that won't ultimately will prove to be inaccurate, obviously. The 2019 draft first round is fairly solid in hindsight.

This class is weak on immediate impact players but full of players that need time to develop. It think if you are picking outside the top 10 you better not need an immediate starter at that position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Yeah that's not the point. It comes down to losing confidence in the GMs ability to perform a very big part of his job. Draft. Injuries happen in football. But when guys start missing time due to known injuries, that's a problem. 

And how do we know it won't turn into another Horn or Brooks situation? It doesn't have to be Carter. But the first 2 to 3 picks need to be on the field with minimal injury concerns. That wasn't the case last season. 

There's no crystal ball about any of this stuff. Plenty of guys with no track record of injury turn to glass in the NFL. But if you draft a guy knowing he's dealing with an injury going into it and he might miss a little time it's not like you have a panic attack when he's not on the field week one. LOL 

I'm generally not a big fan of drafting injured players but this just isn't one that scares me. Which is why he's still almost certainly gone before #8 anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

This class is weak on immediate impact players but full of players that need time to develop. It think if you are picking outside the top 10 you better not need an immediate starter at that position. 

I wouldn't even necessarily throw the "lack of immediate impact players" as much as, lack of elite impact guys.

To me the depth of this class through early 3rd round is really great. Hence why I really want to snag 3 guys in the top 60.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I wouldn't even necessarily throw the "lack of immediate impact players" as much as, lack of elite impact guys.

To me the depth of this class through early 3rd round is really great. Hence why I really want to snag 3 guys in the top 60.

I agree with you. There is a lot of depth in this class. I would love to have 4 picks in the top 100. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There's no crystal ball about any of this stuff. Plenty of guys with no track record of injury turn to glass in the NFL. But if you draft a guy knowing he's dealing with an injury going into it and he might miss a little time it's not like you have a panic attack when he's not on the field week one. LOL 

I'm generally not a big fan of drafting injured players but this just isn't one that scares me. Which is why he's still almost certainly gone before #8 anyway.

I agree that he'll be off the board by #8. I'm just not sure that Carolina should take a chance if he is. If he misses significant time, I don't think Morgan has built up enough credit to keep fans, and more importantly Tepper, confident in his ability to make good draft choices. Legette and Brooks had previous injuries before being drafted. Wallace didn't but is questionable for training camp due to injury during the season. Track record isn't great so far.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I wouldn't even necessarily throw the "lack of immediate impact players" as much as, lack of elite impact guys.

To me the depth of this class through early 3rd round is really great. Hence why I really want to snag 3 guys in the top 60.

I can't see us staying at the Bottom of the 2nd round with all them 4ths and 5ths 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Yeah that's not the point. It comes down to losing confidence in the GMs ability to perform a very big part of his job. Draft. Injuries happen in football. But when guys start missing time due to known injuries, that's a problem. 

And how do we know it won't turn into another Horn or Brooks situation? It doesn't have to be Carter. But the first 2 to 3 picks need to be on the field with minimal injury concerns. That wasn't the case last season. 

The Brooks pick was just so dumb. Trading up in the 2nd to draft a RB coming off of a major injury? Just DUMB. As for Horn, I don't recall any injury concerns for him coming into the draft.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Brooks pick was just so dumb. Trading up in the 2nd to draft a RB coming off of a major injury? Just DUMB. As for Horn, I don't recall any injury concerns for him coming into the draft.

Horn was pretty much always on the field in SC.

These random injuries just started popping up when he was cursed by the black cat.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...