Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I might know what the Cardinals "saw"


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

So what's the verdict:

See my last post, your trying to read into the Cardinals decencive genius and some tale is what exposed Jake, when in truth he did it all by himself. Jake is always on a fine line between above and below average. If he'd been at least average last night the Panthers would have had a fighting chance, he wasn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See my last post, your trying to read into the Cardinals decencive genius and some tale is what exposed Jake, when in truth he did it all by himself. Jake is always on a fine line between above and below average. If he'd been at least average last night the Panthers would have had a fighting chance, he wasn't.

If the whole depth of your insight is "Jake sucks" you don't have a whole lot to contribute to the discussion. Jake's always been phenomenal in the postseason. That's why last night was such an aberration.

And for the record, Clancy Pendergast is pretty close to a defensive genius, and he came up with brilliant game plans for both of the Cardinals playoff games this season. I'll be interested to see what he does next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So in other words the Cardinals coaches did what they were supposed to do, and coach their team.

They watched film they actually prepared, they were ready.

That is not something we can say. Where is that poo coming from on our side? The answer is no where.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They saw what everybody else saw, the Cardinals ran a zone defense on the Panthers last night, you know the same type of defense the panthers get torched in.

The thing about zone defenses is this though if you get mininum pressure a good accurate QB is able to read the coverage and torch you, most of the time you have have to blitz and apply haevy pressure. The Cardinals didnt have to blitz Jake and he had plenty of time in the pocket, he's just not that accurate and locks onto receivers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it every other year we have the he sucks debate and he still remains the only option?

The guy had more INTs than TDs this year! Add to that he had the benifit of an outstanding running game, which is always a QBs best friend.

Double clutching, locking onto to receivers, or bojangles grease on his fingers the bottom line is he is a sub par QB. His career has benifited greatly being in Carolina, theres no other team in the NFL that would have put up with it this long. No other fan base that would allow it. Which teams in the NFL do you think would take Jake too start for there team next year? I find it difficult to come up with any.

I would be willing to bet Carolina will and with one of the best WRs in the league, very capable supporting cast and outstanding running game we will be expected to believe his over 10td to 8.5 int ratio is exceptable. For that I blame the front office and coaching staff. After all he is what he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They seen what every team has seen all damn year. He throws to Smith and sometimes Moose, that's about it. Cover them. Seemed to work.

EXACTLY.

You don't do anything new except put a TE out wide. Thats it? You throw deep to Moose, wow, thats brilliant.

The sheer and utter arrogance of the coaching staff was ENORUMOUS in this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get real tired of hearing that Steve Smith does not have a second compliment. We could have Jake play with all the Arizona receivers and he still would lock in on one guy. Without Smitty, he actually spread it around. As we saw yesterday...he simply lacks any vision.

We will never develop a second(other than Moose), let alone a third reciever(400-600yrd range) with Jake as the QB. Pass catching tight end or half back screens???....not in this lifetime.....I bet yo Bo'berry biscuits it cannot happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
    • Especially since we’re neck and neck with them for the play in
×
×
  • Create New...