Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mikko To Dallas


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Can't fault the front office for trying - we weren't going to keep Necas past this year anyway. If anything, better for it to happen now than give the bum 13 mill over 8 years for him to be a cone out there

The trying is nice but this is two straight failures.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KillerKat said:

Like hell you cant! Shouldve gotten a ball park figure from him before making the trade. 

Sure, and he could say 1 thing (I'll sign for you for 13 mill AAV for 7 years) and then get here and say something different (I want 15 mill AAV for 8 years). Seems like Rantonen and his agent aren't the most trustworthy dues

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

The trying is nice but this is two straight failures.

The Guentzel failure is much, much worse than this IMO. Guentzel wanted to seemingly be here and our front office tried to play hardball and it blew up in their face. Rantanen just does not want to play here unless we give him more than apparently any other team needs to

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two late firsts and a 5’8” center.

This team just got set back years…. Necas could have pulled that at the deadline next year with an extension.

It’ll take two years for this team to be a contender again and that’s IF Nadeau and Nikishin come as advertised.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

So seeing Stankoven and two first round picks… huge meh.

Yeah, Stankoven is pretty awful and I think Dallas doesn't have a 1st this year, so it will be future firsts. Awful value - I'd rather just keep Rantanen here the rest of the year, tie him to the goal posts, and have everyone on our team take turns spearing him

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Sounds like it's going to be Stankoven and 2 future firsts from what I've seen on Reddit. Absolutely terrible return, but unfortunately we didn't have a choice

 

7 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

So seeing Stankoven and two first round picks… huge meh.

Nothing final yet, but...

Screenshot_20250307_132317_Chrome.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Using college stats to prove someone is a better pro!?!??! Cmon! We all want Tmac to succeed, but at this point his Pro stats are 0.0.0
    • Clark played 2 seasons in college and had a grand total of 1,340 yards with 6 TDs. T-Mac had 1,402 and 10 as a Sophomore and 1,319 and 8 as a Junior in one less game since they didn't make a bowl (not to mention his 702 and 8 as a Freshman). In 9 years, Chark had 4,440 yards in his 7 seasons in the NFL and 2 years of college playing time, T-Mac had 3,423 yards in his 3 seasons in college alone. Chark's only 1,000 yard NFL season (which was only 1,008 yards to begin with, and only 3 games over 79 yards that year) came in an offense where the only other non RB's in the offense to have more than 35 targets were Chris Conely (90 targets for 775 yards) and Dede Westbrook (101 targets for 660 yards).  His 2nd best season, his competition for targets was Keelan Cole Sr (88 targets for 642 yards), Laviska (79 targets for 600) and Conley again (63 targets for 471). Beyond his 1k season, he had seasons of 706, 525, 502, 174, 154, and 31 yards, despite being the #1 WR on his team for 3 of his 4 seasons that he had over 174 yards. Any 1st round WR should already be considered a better WR than that, let alone one taken in the Top 10 and has the college statistics that T-Mac had.  Had we traded back and taken Egbuka or Golden, I'd still be saying the same thing about them vs Chark, this has nothing to do with my personal love of T-Mac. 
    • I'm not sure his idea of us being 28th at the start of the season isn't wrong. It's hard to project who we are based off the fact all the rookies we are depending on to contribute but know nothing about. we don't know what derrick brown looks like week 1.. hunter renfrow t-mac,legette, and our tight ends. we are going to have two new starting safeties no matter what. I think it's hard to know just which way the dial can swing on this roster.
×
×
  • Create New...