Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Expendables...Hit or Miss??

Dpantherman

By Dpantherman,
in Huddle Lounge

Expendables  

26 members have voted

  1. 1. Expendables

    • Hit
      14
    • Miss
      12

Recommended Posts

theedaddy Newbie

theedaddy

Posted
Posted

Why do they need to act? As long as they can a)look at the screen and scowl, b)flex thier muscles and scream while shooting an unmounted M-60, and c)roll on the floor and shoot 12 bad guys with 6 bullets they will be fine.

If you want acting go over to Zod's house and watch the English Patient while you do each others nails.

aplausoszt4uo8.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
charlotte49er Newbie

charlotte49er

Posted
Posted

I'll be sure to see it and I hope it's a hit, but it'll probably be a miss. Too many stars in one film usually make for bad films.

Great Escape was right up there in my book! Seeing McQueen jump the fences on the motorcycle was worth it alone! That had an all-star cast!

But up to know, the best bad a** cast has to be "The Magnificent Seven!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bear Hands
      Noah Fant? "Perfect fix?" More like imperfect fix.

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      I've liked him since his rookie year as a prospect, but when he's been asked to play in a large capacity, he has simply not done well.   He does not really add anything, rather muddies up the room.  Fant is TERRIBLE as a blocker, a pure receiving TE.   Let's just put Tremble aside since he's PUP (although I still like him as a TE2, but yeah he's not our future starter)... Sanders has already shown better receiving skills than a Fant and has a nice ceiling.  Not to mention, he's got in-line run blocking skills.  I really want to see what he's capable of this year.  Also has a year+ experience now in Canales' offense, not to mention legit chemistry with Bryce. And after Sanders, I also imagine our staff is waiting to see how Mitchell Evans looks in camp as he's got the in-line blocking skills.  If he looks fully capable of filling in behind Sanders, then I don't see a need.  Overall, keep an eye out on early August moves.  They are usually soft indicators of how staff's view their rookie late rounders and roster overall.  This is a wait and see what the market presents and how they think their unit looks in camp.  
    • CRA
      give some props to Andy Dalton

      By CRA · Posted

      Every team has different needs of the backup QB.   On some teams a young hopeful makes sense and on others an old worn out dude makes sense.  We are a little more in the in-between IMO where you probably would prefer a Fields, Pickett, Howell type IMO.   So a young disappoint that you there is still some hail mary hope in.....given BY essentially was benched both seasons for performance (I know that's not the official line going into Seattle but I think most would agree he got a break and should of been benched later that year).  I know we want Bryce to be the week 17 guy all season this upcoming year.  But it's still in the reasonable thought process that the other dude could show back up. 
    • PanthersGTI
      Noah Fant? "Perfect fix?" More like imperfect fix.

      By PanthersGTI · Posted

      I wouldn't mind it if they bring him in cheap for competition. I would imagine he would vie for the 3rd TE spot with the rookie. 
×
×
  • Create New...