Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The WR core according to Gantt


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

Also, if we keep those 5 and something happened to Smith, who plays #1 WR?

Moore would set records for coverage sacks waiting for Jarrett to clear defenders. LaFell doesn't seem ready and would probably drop the few balls Moore managed to hookshot over whatever defensive end is about to decapitate him.

Wallace Wright?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think we carry six and Moore makes it. If we get rid of Jarrett, then Gettis makes it.

We may try to stash Gettis on the practice squad, but someone will nab him.

I just dont see the reason, Beaux. 6 wr's for what? Why would we NEED Moore on the roster. I gotta say, if he makes the roster then that should mean one of two things about him. Either he is a madman on ST's or he has the potential to be MUCH more than he is now. Undoubtedly, your opinion differs on the latter and you do think that he can be much more, but we have our hands full with two rookies (AND another receiver who might actually be dumber than Dexter Manley). . .can the coaching staff handle juggling all that at WR at one time?

It's my impression that you take a few young guys and you work with em. If you take too many young guys then maybe they dont progress as well as they could. Fahk Idk how it works man, but I personally would rather tutor one person at a time than 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...