Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you rather...

hepcat

By hepcat,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

boo7382 Rookie

boo7382

Posted
Posted

See Deangelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart rack up 300 yards rushing...

OR Matt Moore rack up 300 yards passing...

And still lose the game?

Neither. I wanna win the game.

But if I had to choose. Matt Moore just b/c we already know DWill and Jstew can dominate.

and hopefully those 300 yds would be split btween tight ends, steve smith, and a number 2 receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

Stupid question in my opinion. All that matters is winning. I would rather that we had 0 total offensive yards and scored on a safety and won 2-0 than lost even if we racked 1000 offensive yards.

If we lose it doesn't really matter how many offensive yards we got or who got them. We still lost and it will have no bearing on how we do the next game. It isn't like passing for 300 yards against New York will help us against Tampa in any way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Stupid question in my opinion. All that matters is winning. I would rather that we had 0 total offensive yards and scored on a safety and won 2-0 than lost even if we racked 1000 offensive yards.

If we lose it doesn't really matter how many offensive yards we got or who got them. We still lost and it will have no bearing on how we do the next game. It isn't like passing for 300 yards against New York will help us against Tampa in any way.

The whole point of this thread is just the question....of course we'd rather have -48 yards and win 2-0. But it's just a question...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bigdog10 Experienced

bigdog10

Posted
Posted

Stupid question in my opinion. All that matters is winning. I would rather that we had 0 total offensive yards and scored on a safety and won 2-0 than lost even if we racked 1000 offensive yards.

If we lose it doesn't really matter how many offensive yards we got or who got them. We still lost and it will have no bearing on how we do the next game. It isn't like passing for 300 yards against New York will help us against Tampa in any way.

Stupid response in my opinion. Your crazy if you don't think what the panthers do against the Giants will have any bearing on the next game against Tampa. Tampa will watch the tape and have to adjust to what the panthers show against the giants, and if Moore were to rack up 300 yards passing while looking poised and accurate, that just makes Tampa's job that much tougher to stop our offense in the following week. Tampa, of all teams, know what double trouble is capable of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

Stupid response in my opinion. Your crazy if you don't think what the panthers do against the Giants will have any bearing on the next game against Tampa. Tampa will watch the tape and have to adjust to what the panthers show against the giants, and if Moore were to rack up 300 yards passing while looking poised and accurate, that just makes Tampa's job that much tougher to stop our offense in the following week. Tampa, of all teams, know what double trouble is capable of.

Of course teams look at film from other games. But we could score 50 points against the Giants and 5 against tampa because their team isn't the same at all. What we gameplan and run against the Giants could be different than what we run against Tampa. Sure we will run but for example when we played Minnesota last year we threw for 300 yards and ran for 100 and then the next week against New York we threw for 170 and ran for 250. Two completely different strategies for 2 completely different defenses.

What they watch film for is to see how we line up. What formations and variations we use, whether there are any tells by the quarterback and so on.

Teams gameplan based on what personnel they have and how they match up with ours. For example if the Giants have great receivers and make circus catches, Tampa can't do the same if they have different personnel and instead have a great tight end but poor receivers.

So no, each game is a completely different chessmatch and have little bearing on the next. Your point is like an apple and orange argument. It only relates to what I am talking about very tangentially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

The whole point of this thread is just the question....of course we'd rather have -48 yards and win 2-0. But it's just a question...

But the assumption you make is that if we throw or run well then it is a sign that our offense is back or that it will be a harbinger of good things to come. And as I said in a prior post, that may or may not be true. The Giants gave up 300 yards in the air and 100 yards on the ground in the preseason. So if we throw for 250 we shouldn't be exactly congratulating ourselves. On the other hand if we run for 300 it might mean alot more. On the other hand if they load 9 in the box and Moore consistently beats them, then it could be a good sign if he only throws for 250 yards and we only run for 150. In the end scoring 24 points no matter how we do it would make me feel much better than all the yards we gather.

My point is that simplistic questions like that hardly account for the complexities in a game nor do they tell you much until you have several games upon which to evaluate. Hence my point in a few other threads that we will know where we stand by the bye week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      Panthers Sign QB Will Grier

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • strato
      Panthers Sign QB Will Grier

      By strato · Posted

      Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • PleaseCutStewart
      My new favorite for #19.

      By PleaseCutStewart · Posted

      Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...