Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who gets TD first... Jarret, LaFell, Gettis, Edwards?


1989

Recommended Posts

My vote is Jarret. I know he hasnt been in the past but he really is a threat in the red zone. I know Gettis and Edwards or mainly inactive but even so you could argue their case with the lack of splendor our receivers show. LaFell may get his hands on the ball in the endzone first but he'll most likely drop it.

what chu think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ill go ahead and say DJ.

He had a couple nice grabs Sunday.

Who was it that totally had pass interference BIG TIME and the ref didn't call it right after they had called it on us? That was a B.S. play. Think it mighta been Lafell but Im not sure.

It was LaFell. They called one later on him.

That at least shows me he's getting separation, which Jarrett struggles to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was LaFell. They called one later on him.

That at least shows me he's getting separation, which Jarrett struggles to do.

From what I remember in my blurred rage of anger, the Giants player was like pretty much grabbing his hands and preventing him from even being close to catching the ball. That was some bullshit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...