Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Morgan and Brandt Tilis press conference

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CanadianCat said:

The biggest take away, and Im surprised that no one mentioned it is where they asked Tilis if the reason for the structure of the deals being mostly 2 year deals is because of BY potential contract and he said,

 

"... we didnt think too much about Bryce and where he is, thats still TBD."

I appreciate his candor. Lots to prove this season for a number of guys including our QB. You see what you've got this season and go from there.

2 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

- Plan at 8 is still BPA

 

2 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

“I do see the potential of us trading back and picking up more picks.” - Dan Morgan

Don't overthink it. We can't draft to save our lives in the second round anyways. BPA at 8 and keep it moving.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Panthers' defensive overhaul in free agency means draft flexibility

https://www.panthers.com/news/panthers-defensive-overhaul-in-free-agency-means-draft-flexibility

I do not see it this way--we upgraded, but we will need to draft an Edge, WR, DT, CB, S, OT, and maybe a TE.  That is six or seven needs and I don't really see that as flexibility. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
TheSpecialJuan Grand Master

TheSpecialJuan

Posted
  • Author
  • Popular Post
Posted
9 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I do not see it this way--we upgraded, but we will need to draft an Edge, WR, DT, CB, S, OT, and maybe a TE.  That is six or seven needs and I don't really see that as flexibility. 

I think Dan and Brandt realized they can't fix everything in one offseason and instead they've made several prudent moves to add competent starters and depth pieces. It's the smart long-term play.  

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pejorative Miscreant Grand Master

Pejorative Miscreant

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, rebelrouser said:

That is most likely going to be Ashton Jeanty.  

I think it depends on how they quantify “BPA”.  From a talent, playmaker, insert superlative standpoint I think you may be correct.  If BPA grade takes into account need, positional value and other factors he will not likely be “BPA”.  
 

Not disagreeing with you but when they drop BPA I can’t take it literally.   I thought about creating a topic on different factors that might go into BPA for these guys as I think it might spurn interesting conversation but never got around to it. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

I think it depends on how they quantify “BPA”.  From a talent, playmaker, insert superlative standpoint I think you may be correct.  If BPA grade takes into account need, positional value and other factors he will not likely be “BPA”.  
 

Not disagreeing with you but when they drop BPA I can’t take it literally.   I thought about creating a topic on different factors that might go into BPA for these guys as I think it might spurn interesting conversation but never got around to it. 

Probably more like best defender available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rebelrouser Mentor

rebelrouser

Posted
Posted
Just now, PNW_PantherMan said:

What if BPA is a long snapper

I think you can leave out special teams based on limited playing time. BPA for a position of need is simply not BPA; it is drafting for need.  The two most likely available players at 8 who are at the top of their position are Jeanty and the LSU tackle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted (edited)

He said something like the best bplayer that can help us or something to that affect.

We don't have any glaring holes in order to field a team and have flexibility. You can argue what we should do and there are valued arrangements for several positions. Which i believe is evidence they put themselves in a good situation for the draft.

Edited by csx
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jb2288
      Time to Sign David Njoku

      By jb2288 · Posted

      He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • MrBubba
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By MrBubba · Posted

      Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • strato
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By strato · Posted

      I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...