Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stop being stupid, people. Moore v. Clausen hardly matters


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Here we go again, like some bad seesaw ride. At this point, the debate is really not about whether Moore or Clausen is the "future of the franchise". Don't you see that it has become a real possibility that neither one of these guys will be here next season? WTF are you debating? The season, and the team has been blown up. This is a transition period between the old and the new. Unless Matt Moore comes in and wins at least 8 out of 11 games, he ain't even in the conversation anymore. Clausen is still a rookie who has looked "scared" behind an O-line that will undoubtedly change next season unless the guys pull their heads out of their asses.

Get real, people. There is a real possibility that a new coach will bring in his own guy, Moore will not be re-signed, and Clausen will be dealt elsewhere. And, to be honest, the way that our O-line has been performing, as well as our young and suspect receiving corps, why is there any reason to debate about who starts? Ultimately it's not going to make a difference, especially this year, and, probably not next year either. Everything, and everyone, is up in the air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clausen is rookie who is on a rookie contract and paid next to nothing. He will be here for at least three more years.

Not necessarily, though you are probably correct. Now, that doesn't mean he'll be starting. You also have to know that it doesn't necessarily mean that a new regime won't be drafting Luck, Locker or acquiring someone else. Two rookies on a team makes one of them expendable (and an easy pick-up for someone else if the Panthers were to shop him).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

at this point, all that matters and getting some entertaining games....THIS year. Start Moore, I'd like to win a game and not watch them go 0-16. I will worry about the future when we know who our new coach is.....

plus, I have Smitty in 2 fantasy leagues and Moore makes him relevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

at this point, all that matters and getting some entertaining games....THIS year. Start Moore, I'd like to win a game and not watch them go 0-16. I will worry about the future when we know who our new coach is.....

plus, I have Smitty in 2 fantasy leagues and Moore makes him relevant.

Now the truff comes out about your love affair with Moore! He focuses in on Smith so he helps your fantasy team!!!! AH HA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weinke got his chance to "shine" beyond just 3 games... Clausen will too, and it may be this season.

If the panthers go nowhere, even if Moore is playing fine, we may see Clausen at the end of the season.

I hope Moore plays well, though. Be it here or elsewhere, his career largely depends on doing well in his remaining starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, I agree, P55. This is Moore's audition.

Clausen could literally go out and lead us to 0-16 and he would be unlikely to get cut. He may never start again and may get cut a year later, but he'd probably be here next year.

Moore needs to show what he can do from here on out to have a job some place - not even here, as he probably will be released - but anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...