Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jarrett--Hackett--Robinson--Draft Pick--FA


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

The Bears said Marty Booker may be out of the mix next year. Accoriding to Rotoworld he is on the hook for a one million dollar salary. So the Panthers could get him pretty cheap.

#1 Smitty

#2 Moose

#3 Marty Booker

#4 Jarrett

#5 Carter

But right now we have tons of receivers

1. Steve Smith

2. Muhsin Muhammad

3. D.J. Hackett

4. Dwayne Jarrett

5. Mark Jones

6. Ryne Robinson

7. Jason Carter

8. Kenneth Moore

9. Kevin McMahan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's a guarantee that Mark Jones makes the team. It's true that he was decent on punt returns but he was in the bottom third of the league on kick returns. Robinson shows promise as a receiver, and really looked to be improving on returns before the injury. It will be a battle between those two in TC.

I'd take Jarrett over Hackett, just because he has more potential. He just needs more opportunities to catch the ball.

1. Smith

2. Moose

3. Jarrett

4. Robinson

5. Jason Carter or Draft Pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we don't need housh.

we need defense. going after housh would only hurt our chances of getting a solid D. don't want him. don't need him.

smitty

moose

jarrett

robinson

carter

T.J. is better than Moose, Jarrett, Carter and Robinson. When we lose Pep, cut Lucas, and cut Jones (Ryne is the KR to be) we'll have room to sign him and a FA D star. Yes, he's old...so sign him for just two years. Then use the draft for defensive picks. Smith + Housh + Double Trouble = DAMN SCARY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...