Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Limiting the offensive game plan?


Cyberjag

Recommended Posts

Moore never started a game in 2008, except maybe Jan 2008.

but to answer your question, they probably dumb it down because the QB's can't make the throws for the whole playbook. I doubt the Panthers passing playbook is that big anyway, probably like half a page written on the back of a McDonald's cheeseburger wrapper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would think it's abbreviated somewhat, allowing the rookie to get some basics and gradually expand with play variations, that makes tons of sense. If we could only get a close up view of that QB wristband to see how many numbers are on it.

My guess: 1: run up the middle, 2: run right, 3: run left, 4: throw it away, 5: throw a pick, 6: punt, 7: fumble snap, 8: fumble RB exchange on play 1, 2, or 3; and 9: one-hop it to Steve Smith.

That's it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a disney movie back in the 70's with Mule that could kick a field goal from 90 yards out. The offensive game plan was get it to the 20, take three knees, and let the mule kick. Is that a simple enough game plan? And can we find a fg kicking mule?

Gus the Mule ! Sign him up. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Smith-Wade for me. He has the path to some decent hefty snaps in Evero’s scheme. He held his own last year and improved as he continued to get snaps— If he makes some strides, could be a very capable nickel.  I agree with Sanders. Bryce had some trust in him that final Falcons game post crazy head-stand.  Bryce looked for him a lot that final game and made some critical catches to get us the W. Seems he’s put in major work so I’m hopeful about him.  Wallace will have an offseason under his belt. I like him a lot, was higher graded than most remember in his draft (I.e Brugler had him LB3/70 overall) but he isn’t as cerebral of an LB as we’re used to. I think he could thrive if we get D captain/film-junky type next to him— because right now that’s Jewell.  Still a bit cautious but love the talent. Rozeboom may snag some playing time from him if he’s still working out the kinks.
    • Didnt Canales already say starters are playing in the pre season? either way extra reps dont hurt but im not one of those people that think playing in the pre season would have saved Bryce from an awful start.
    • very helpful.  I read back in this thread where they might try Jarvis at C--I thought he and Aho had good chemistry, however.  Nonetheless, he could expand his value there, and now we have a guy who can play jarvis' spot.  Freddie is a pro, no doubt--and as little as I know about the inner workings of strategy and positions, I could tell Burns was burning us at times.  I figured he'd retire and I was looking forward to it.  FWIW, they have Jarvis listed as a C on the 2025-26 roster.
×
×
  • Create New...