Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFLPA Response to Owners Desire for 18-Game Season

Anybodyhome

By Anybodyhome,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5813574&campaign=rss&source=NFLHeadlines

The highlights of the union proposal:

"•Voluntary offseason workouts would be reduced from the current 14 weeks to five weeks or 20 days (four days a week, four-hour maximum per day).

• Significantly reduced contact between players during training camp with four practices a week consisting of helmetless and padless periods.

• Two in-season bye weeks.

• Expanded rosters from the current 53 to 56 or 57, in addition to practice squads.

• Increased pro-rated salaries for players under contract.

• Reduction of the amount of games players need to become vested to qualify for post-career health care and pension benefits."

I'm actually on board with the counter proposal. I do think the rosters need to be expanded and practice squads should be bigger.

And just when you were getting optimistic:

"Despite optimistic public assertions made by high-profile owners such as Robert Kraft of the New England Patriots, there have been no substantive recent negotiations, nor are there any scheduled, on a new collective bargaining agreement."

"Unrelated to the 18-game schedule, also remaining on the table are proposals from each side to include a rookie hard wage scale that could be in effect as early as the 2011 draft. However, whereas the owners want the $200 million on projected rookie wage savings redistributed with $100 million to improved retired player pensions and health care and the remaining $100 million to simply be available in the system with an increased pay-for-performance pool, the union wants the owners to match the $100 million savings on retired players."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Floppin Grand Master

Floppin

Posted
Posted

Someone should bring in ratings for MLB in '93 and then last year and slap all of them for even considering the killing of the golden goose

MLB ratings were actually higher the two years after the strike than the five year average before the strike. However since 1995 the ratings have declined slowly and steadily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

Someone posted a while back that we'd get the same draft order 2 years in a row. Never looked it up to verify it cuz I'm too lazy.

from what i've seen/heard/know/whatever...in the event of a lockout the 2011 draft would go on like usual, but the 2012 draft order would be decided on by lottery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Matthias Proficient

Matthias

Posted
Posted

So if there is no football next season, the 2011 draft will be all the NFL action we will receive for that year. Since the draft is usually a big event, this will make it all the more special. So the superbowl champion for the 2011-12 season will be determined in the draft! Panthers have a good shot at this one.:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

thoughts on the proposals...

•Voluntary offseason workouts would be reduced from the current 14 weeks to five weeks or 20 days (four days a week, four-hour maximum per day).
this could probably be compromised on. they could meet somewhere in the middle on this one and both be happy.

• Significantly reduced contact between players during training camp with four practices a week consisting of helmetless and padless periods.
language on this is funny. i don't know if they are trying to get training camp down to 4 practices a week, but i don't see that flying at all. limit it to 5 days of practice a week and a total of 8 practices during those 5 days, with 4 of those practices being reduced contact and helmetless/padless practices seem reasonable. (yes, pulled that out of my butt)

• Two in-season bye weeks.
makes sense.

• Expanded rosters from the current 53 to 56 or 57, in addition to practice squads.
definitely need to do this.

• Increased pro-rated salaries for players under contract.
sure, why not?

• Reduction of the amount of games players need to become vested to qualify for post-career health care and pension benefits."
considering the attention that the league is now paying to trying to protect players from long term injuries or at least limit the damage, this seems like a logical next step.

"Unrelated to the 18-game schedule, also remaining on the table are proposals from each side to include a rookie hard wage scale that could be in effect as early as the 2011 draft. However, whereas the owners want the $200 million on projected rookie wage savings redistributed with $100 million to improved retired player pensions and health care and the remaining $100 million to simply be available in the system with an increased pay-for-performance pool, the union wants the owners to match the $100 million savings on retired players."
seems like a fair compromise to me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • fieryprophet
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By fieryprophet · Posted

      I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • CRA
      Where do you fall on the Bryce Young spectrum?

      By CRA · Posted

      there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • ColumbusCounty
      Defense ranked 10th

      By ColumbusCounty · Posted

      In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...