Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In order to regain some success in the coming seasons...


Darth Urious

Recommended Posts

Fans almost universally want some Tourette's afflicted press conference screamer like Jim Mora or a poo talker like Rex Ryan because they think he has "swagger". People naturally want blood after a shitty game and there are few things less satisfying than a few token cliches chucked out in a press conference. Life goes on.

Meanwhile quiet pussy Tony Dungy polishes his Lombardi trophy and waits for his Hall of Fame blazer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah we don't have the personnel now but even if we do get the personnel we have to have someone who knows how to use it properly. When I say "fire" I'm not talking about a hot head like Rex Ryan but someone to motivate players. Tony Dungy wasn't a media ***** but he was smart with his players and knew how to handle them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fans almost universally want some Tourette's afflicted press conference screamer like Jim Mora or a poo talker like Rex Ryan because they think he has "swagger". People naturally want blood after a shitty game and there are few things less satisfying than a few token cliches chucked out in a press conference. Life goes on.

Meanwhile quiet pussy Tony Dungy polishes his Lombardi trophy and waits for his Hall of Fame blazer.

Tony Dungy is Mr. Rodgers plain and simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fans almost universally want some Tourette's afflicted press conference screamer like Jim Mora or a sh*t talker like Rex Ryan because they think he has "swagger". People naturally want blood after a sh*tty game and there are few things less satisfying than a few token cliches chucked out in a press conference. Life goes on.

Meanwhile quiet pussy Tony Dungy polishes his Lombardi trophy and waits for his Hall of Fame blazer.

It could easily be argued that Dungy underachieved in the playoffs.

Yes, he is a great coach and good team builder. Yet he only won 1 Super Bowl with arguably the greatest QB to ever play...

(they beat the Grossman led Bears at that)

And it took another coach to win with his team in Tampa.

Dungy was too soft IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could easily be argued that Dungy underachieved in the playoffs.

Yes, he is a great coach and good team builder. Yet he only won 1 Super Bowl with arguably the greatest QB to ever play...

(they beat the Grossman led Bears at that)

And it took another coach to win with his team in Tampa.

Dungy was too soft IMO.

He may have been soft but he still has one more title than a lot of more boisterous coaches.

The way I look at it, a coach's success depends a lot on whether his style resonates with the players. I remember reading that Mike Maser's style wasn't getting it done anymore around the time Magazu showed up, for instance. This is probably the most obvious concept in the world, but it doesn't jive well with the idea that a coach who shoots his mouth off to the media and shows "passion" and "fire" has a sure or even better than average shot at lasting success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He may have been soft but he still has one more title than a lot of more boisterous coaches.

The way I look at it, a coach's success depends a lot on whether his style resonates with the players. This is probably the most obvious concept in the world, but it doesn't jive well with the idea that a coach who shoots his mouth off to the media and shows "passion" and "fire" has a sure or even better than average shot at lasting success.

Overall I agree, I am just saying Dungy in particular should have won more.

He was 9-10 in the playoffs. He knew how to get there, but struggled in big games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overall I agree, I am just saying Dungy in particular should have won more.

He was 9-10 in the playoffs. He knew how to get there, but struggled in big games.

It's anybody's guess really. He's sure as hell being lionized now but I remember him being run out of Tampa and the natives getting quite restless in Indy at points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could easily be argued that Dungy underachieved in the playoffs.

Yes, he is a great coach and good team builder. Yet he only won 1 Super Bowl with arguably the greatest QB to ever play...

(they beat the Grossman led Bears at that)

And it took another coach to win with his team in Tampa.

Dungy was too soft IMO.

Sweet, then bring in some guy to build the team into an awesome, consistent playoff contender, and then let some jerk replace him after that. Guaranteed Superbowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most successful coach in the league right now is a guy whose press conferences remind you of a backward high school nerd fumbling for a good way to ask the head cheerleader out on a date.

I think Bill just thinks its a waste of time and he feels that he doesn't have to or need to try to explain himself to the "underlings" who are beneath him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets face it, we need a coach that commands the respect of JR and the players.I think JR and his mgmt flunkies will have the tendency to get too involved in personal decisions....so a coach that has been there done that will be more likely to succeed than a guy that is a rising star.To use one of Parcells analogies a head coach is like a chef ..if you are going to hold a chef accountable for how the dish turns out then he needs to be able to pick out the ingredients.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've got another viral Panthers song The dab is back Jags Week 1, Ohio State National Title, JLo got divorced...   Nature is healing, it's Super Bowl time
    • Its too late for that.  Time has run out.  You dont give him a ext if he plays "decent".  He played "decent" at the end of last year and look what happened.  
    • I’m not necessarily advocating sticking with Bryce. His highs show the ability is there, but there’s enough bad film out there to doubt that he can consistently enough play at a high enough level. But this video from Brett Kollman is a pretty good argument to give it a bit more time, whether that be rolling with Bryce just next year or picking up his 5th year option (not extending him).      The gist is that the structural (wider hashes) and rule (3 yd vs 1 yd thresholds for intelligible offensive lineman downfield penalties) differences in the college and NFL have led to wildly different play calling and scheme diets in college. There is much more shotgun and RPO calls in college and screen/quick throws. This simply doesn’t set up young QBs to be able to play under center, which is more preferred in the NFL due to RBs being able to more effectively run out of that formation.  They don’t know how to do it and have to learn. Yes, the NFL has trended more toward college style offense in the last decade or so, but it isn’t that pronounced and is more out of necessity than desire. And on top of all that, they ask the young QBs to do all this learning with coaching and other personnel churn going on around them.  Bad results lead to coaches getting fired and new ones with different ideas on scheme and footwork and different terminology and playbooks coming in. It makes it harder on those young QBs to learn.     So we may drop Bryce for a young QB starter in the draft and be in a similar situation. With a QB who is going to take years to learn how to operate in an NFL style offense and will struggle along the way.  So you have to weigh whether the struggles we see from Bryce are more due to this learning process vs solely physical limitations on his part. It’s almost undoubtedly a bit of both, but the answer to that question I think dictates your strategy at QB over the next few years. And of course, you have to consider what the alternatives available are.    I’m neither a Bryce hater or a Bryce Stan and I don’t have an answer to that question. But I do fear that if we move on from him, unless it’s for an established player, we’re just in for continued frustration on the QB front because it’s going to take a few years for a college QB to develop (Drake Maye’s don’t grow on trees). 
×
×
  • Create New...