Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Start AE Please...


Zod

Recommended Posts

I highly doubt that. Whether or not Jimmy Clausen blows chunks, if AE was decent in practice at QB he *would* get more reps...

however, he can't be worse in game than Clausen has been at times, so hey... why not?! ;P

:skep: i think you have the wrong team here sir.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:skep: i think you have the wrong team here sir.

uhm, how so? practice means a ton to Fox. Even our own practice "reporters" have made comments that were not overwhelmingly positive about AE in practice.

if AE was great in practice I do think we'd see more of him over Clausen - this isn't quite the same as veteran loyalty. Fox has already shown he doesn't have much loyalty to Clausen... but I do believe he thinks Clausen is our best bet to win based on practice.

I don't buy the FO argument because he still benched Clausen before, and I can't imagine that he is starting him because he thinks he's looked good in games...

So I come back to the fact I think Clausen is capable of running the type of system Fox wants theoretically, whereas AE has not shown that same ability in practice. While AE has huge potential in a number of ways, to take advantage of it, it would require a lot of extra work when they're having enough trouble getting through practice as it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uhm, how so? practice means a ton to Fox. Even our own practice "reporters" have made comments that were not overwhelmingly positive about AE in practice.

if AE was great in practice I do think we'd see more of him over Clausen - this isn't quite the same as veteran loyalty. Fox has already shown he doesn't have much loyalty to Clausen... but I do believe he thinks Clausen is our best bet to win based on practice.

I don't buy the FO argument because he still benched Clausen before, and I can't imagine that he is starting him because he thinks he's looked good in games...

So I come back to the fact I think Clausen is capable of running the type of system Fox wants theoretically, whereas AE has not shown that same ability in practice. While AE has huge potential in a number of ways, to take advantage of it, it would require a lot of extra work when they're having enough trouble getting through practice as it is.

He was only benched when Moore comeback from the Injury though being Moore was the original starter. Since then the only other game he sat for was vs the Ravens with the concussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? Edwards, didnt play at the highest division in college , has spent the enitre year learning WR, and is a rookie. He could be worse, and even if he was better it'd be by such a small amount that it wouldnt matter either way.

But seriously it would fun to watch. Watching Clausen hand the ball off 2 times and then getting sacked gets old. Even when he mixes things up by throwing it away. Edwards threw 1 pass for 0 yards and was higher ranked than Clausen in passer ratings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know a lot of people want to see this for novelty's sake but since the future of Carolina does not involve AE as a starter, this is overall a stupid idea.

The majority of Carolina Fans seem to adapt to the loser role pretty easily. In fact, Carolina phan epitomizes the role of loser so much we apparently now want non-QB's to play QB.

Ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But seriously it would fun to watch. Watching Clausen hand the ball off 2 times and then getting sacked gets old. Even when he mixes things up by throwing it away. Edwards threw 1 pass for 0 yards and was higher ranked than Clausen in passer ratings.

We probably shouldn't use that to make a point as he was higher rated than Ryan was too I believe. This just goes to show how passer rating on it's own is not a useful metric.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But AE is getting reps at WR, and clearly hasn't shown anything in practice.

yeah, b/c Fox is really paying attention to the 2nd team offense. AE probably isn't even working in the slot likely.

I don't want to get into it.....but lots of guys have looked good in practice per reports and that didn't = playing time on Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know a lot of people want to see this for novelty's sake but since the future of Carolina does not involve AE as a starter, this is overall a stupid idea.

The majority of Carolina Fans seem to adapt to the loser role pretty easily. In fact, Carolina phan epitomizes the role of loser so much we apparently now want non-QB's to play QB.

Ridiculous.

The team is ridiculous at this point. Putting AE in at quarterback wouldn't change the outcome or make things look any worse than they do with Clausen in there. -5 yards passing at the half???? Seriously?????

As for losing you really think putting in Clausen will change things?? At this point when the majority of your fan base is hoping you lose to get the number 1 pick in the draft, playing backups and scrubs is not out of the question. There is no reason AE couldn't run some wildcat and take some snaps under center. There will be plenty of time for Clausen to fumble, throw it away and get sacked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not saying it shouldn't be a part of his game it should be present yes. But expecting 500/10 in the rushing category is not sustainable IMO. All it's going to take is a defender to be willing to sacrifice a penalty or a fine to send a message just as the Falcons did with Sam Darnold. And even as big and durable as Cam was defenses eventually started to try to send a message to him too. We have to be realistic about not putting our QB at unnecessary risk. Especially given the fact we aren't even willing to run a QB sneak with him. We've also invested a good bit in our backfield that's what they're there for. And furthermore ultimately whatever QB  tier Bryce Young ends up landing in over the course of his career it is going to be defined by what he does as a passer not his rushing ability. That's all I'm saying.
    • Bryce had 191 yards 55% completion 1 td 1 pick.  That's an amazing performance?   Come on people
    • His footwork has been discussed many times over related to not just within the pocket but the quality of his drop backs and how while his receivers have been an issue his own footwork has created issues with his receivers. It is a mutual give and take dynamic after all. As far as his deep passing goes I will happily admit I saw some very impressive long throws from Bryce later in the season and I said so at the time and I'm still saying so now. That doesn't mean that there still aren't issues and beyond some instances of him flat out missing receivers deep that he knows he needs to get corrected I think there are still some throws to the sideline that defenses are going to test Bryce on early and often and until he can prove he can beat defenses on those throws consistently they will play him the same way. As far as talk of Bryce being top ten and the metrics that define that different people are going to have different answers and I've said before after the conclusion of the 2024 season that I'm going to try to put yardage aside in some cases and just focus on what Bryce is doing both between the 20's moving the ball and how our redzone scoring percentage is looking. The biggest thing I'm looking for this season is scoring points. Not just field goals. Touchdowns. If the offense is moving consistently and reaching the end zone more often than not and not squandering drives and settling for field goals then I am going to be content for the time being. I do not expect miracles this season. I expect development and competiveness on both sides of the ball but particularly the offense trending upward given the investments we've made. And no blowout losses. I don't think that's an unreasonable ask do you agree? 🫡
×
×
  • Create New...