Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers should win Sunday


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Panthers should win because they will not have to throw the ball against one of the worst defenses in the NFL. The running game is looking up, largely because Schwartz is catching on at RG. They have one of the worst passing offenses in the NFL as well, and a 5th round rookie starting his second game and first on the road. In addition, Every team in the NFC WEST is a last place team in another division, except ours. Their records are bad, but inflated to be better than the team is.

The Cardinals, however, are still in the playoff hunt.

To me, on the road, that just adds pressure. The Panther defense will put 7 or 8 in the box and force Hightower to earn it and the rookie to throw it.

I think that we win this one and I think we play Atlanta's bench in week 17 after 10 days to prepare.

If I am Richardson, I too treat the Atlanta game like a preseason game, looking at talent for next season. I might start players like Stanford (CB) Neblett (DT) and Bernadeau at Center (in the event Kalil leaves). Armanti would play for Smith the entire game and Sutton would carry the ball 25 times.

IF you are hoping for Luck , then pray for the following (not all necessary):

Cincy beats Cleveland

Arizona beats Carolina

Denver beats Oakland

Buffalo wins

Detroit wins

Mr. Scot can take it from here, but Cincinnati has no shot at its next 2 games. If they lose to Cleveland and the Panthers win tomorrow, I would say Luck is lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cards scored 43 on Denver last week, so a win is far from a given.

We have no chance to beat the Steelers and a Steelers win counts 2x as much against the Bengals SoS as it does ours.

Saints are nibbling at the heels of the Falcons so barring a complete collapse by the Saints the Falcons will most likely have to play their starters against us to win the division... and we have no chance against the Falcons starters.

If we win tomorrow we are still very much in the hunt for the # 1 pick and if we lose you might as well go ahead and order your Luck jersey...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a dream last night that Arizona won a close one and then won out the rest of the way to win their division and make the playoffs with a losing record.

LOL, that would be awesome...

Everyone argues that the playoff system should be re-configured so the 6 teams with the best records in each conference go to the playoffs, but look what a 9-7 Cards team did our 12-4 team in 2008... (hate to bring that up, sorry)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The AZ game will probably come down to turnovers and big plays in the return game. AZ is the better team imo, and don't forget Wharton is out. Not to mention Gross is on the downside of his career, and Kalil is not that good, so don't expect the running game to dominate even the lowly Cards. I expect AZ to win this super sh!tty game, and lock us in for Luck (please come out).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, that would be awesome...

Everyone argues that the playoff system should be re-configured so the 6 teams with the best records in each conference go to the playoffs, but look what a 9-7 Cards team did our 12-4 team in 2008... (hate to bring that up, sorry)

I think in the rare case a division winner finishes below.500 the team with the best record that isn't already in the playoffs should take their place.

Below .500 teams should never make the playoffs EVER.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think in the rare case a division winner finishes below.500 the team with the best record that isn't already in the playoffs should take their place.

Below .500 teams should never make the playoffs EVER.

i have to agree with that,just not fair to winning teams to have a losing team win a division

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cincinnati plays the Chargers and the Ravens to finish out the season. Since we both played the Ravens, that's a wash. We don't have San Diego on our schedule, however, so we have to root for them to lose. Other teams they played that are not on our schedule are NE, MIA, PITT, NYJ and IND. Losses by those teams will all bring down the Bengals SOS. Wins by NYG, StL, CHI, SF, and SEA will bring up ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, that would be awesome...

Everyone argues that the playoff system should be re-configured so the 6 teams with the best records in each conference go to the playoffs, but look what a 9-7 Cards team did our 12-4 team in 2008... (hate to bring that up, sorry)

if God told me we would go 12-4 next year but get destroyed by a 9-7 team... i would be ok with that :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce has improved each season, fwiw, statistically.  His slope is rising.  (Not to say I am high on him--I am not, but I have not given up on him--nor have I given up on XL, but damn he pisses me off)  CJ's slope is descending.   I was never a Penix fan.  Never, I say!    
    • That is definitely the down side of all this--on paper, I would offer up a second rounder for him if he passed my interviews.  He has already gone through (seriously?) a treatment program for gambling addiction.  I just see him as a first round talent that we could get with a second rounder.  If I liked Bryce and felt good about paying him $50m per, I would not touch Sorsby.  If Bryce regresses or stays the same--he is going to expect to be paid.  Sorsby, in my view, has a better long-term future as an NFL QB.  He is big, mobile, has good arm strength, and makes wise decisions (on the field) with the football.  He is a great dual threat, RPO QB.   I think he is a perfect solution for the backup qb position and insurance for Bryce should he get injured or suck.  Pickett?  King?  yikes. 
    • Hard to say--they are very unpredictable--this article came out last night---after our comments:  (ESPN)   How has the NFL approached NCAA players with gambling violations in the past? David Purdum, sports betting reporter: Quarterback Hunter Dekkers and wide receiver Kayshon Boutte were found to have committed gambling violations while playing college football, and both were allowed to pursue NFL careers. Dekkers was the projected starting quarterback at Iowa State but was ruled ineligible ahead of the 2023 season after an investigation found he had bet on at least one game involving the Cyclones (among other wagers that violated NCAA bylaws). The bet was just $15 on Iowa State to beat Oklahoma State in a 2021 game in which he did not play, but it led to the end of his Division I career. He played one season at Iowa Western Community College in 2024 before signing with the Saints as an undrafted free agent, and he spent last season on the practice squad. Boutte was arrested in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, in January 2024 on charges of underage betting while at LSU. The arrest came roughly eight months after he had been drafted in Round 6 by the Patriots, and the charges were ultimately dropped. According to police, Boutte placed more than 8,900 wagers from April 2022 to May 2023, including betting on at least 17 college football games -- at least six of which involved LSU during that span. The NFL did not discipline Boutte.
×
×
  • Create New...