Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers should be frontrunner for Cowher


panther4life

Recommended Posts

Potential Head Coaching Vacancies

Tier 1

Carolina

Cincy

Minnesota

San Fran

Dallas

Denver

Tier 2

Miami

Cleavland

Texans

Arizona

Bills

Giants

Chargers

Bears

sticking with the tier 1 teams for now

There have been reports out of dallas, houston, and charlotte from local beat writers that there is no interest in Cowher.

The Vikings already have their guy in Frazier I think.

This leaves Denver, San Fran and Cincy.

Denver probably wont spring for him since their paying Shannahan and McDaniels.

San Fran and Cincy would be ruled out if you believe the reports that Cowher wants an established QB in place, unless he thinks he can fix Palmer.

Granted the orginal source for him wanting an established qb was Bettis who said he was holding out for the Giants Job. That job seems unlikely to be available this year and if he's really itching to get back in the leauge he'll have to compromise somwhere, whether it be power/money,established qb, what have you.

I think Carolina makes the most sense for him in a compromise situation. He wouldnt be expected to come in and immediatley take us to the playoffs after a 1-15/2-14 season and he's also gonna get a top 2 pick and have more room under the salary cap to begin rebuilding the leauges youngest franchise.

In addition to all that, Richardson will leave him alone as much or more than any other owner out there and let him do his thing.

*If you don't like Cowher as the pick, then thats fine( not even sure if I do right now)subsititute him for any coach you want and it still looks to me like were a very nice place to come and start or restore a legacy for any potential coaches out there.

Hurry up offseason!

p.s.-if you really firmly belive theres no shot in hell he comes here and feel like I wasted your time reading this go over to bodog and bet against him coming here and make your self some money

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we don't go OT, we will regret it.  What bothers me?  Are we going to get a starting-caliber OT at 19?  I think the draft is solid at OT, and the more I read up and watch video, the more I watch Lomu, the more I want him.   I see Freeling as a RT who needs some work in run blocking (since we need to run first, maybe not a good fit) and I see Proctor ending up as a Guard.  After Lomu (assuming Mouigia and fanu are gone), I think we wait until round 2.  In round 2, there are about 3-4 I like (Zuhn--good pass blocker and VERY underrated right now; Tiernan is a very good pass blocker as is Miller from Clemson, but both are not good in the run game.  Max Ixxxxx from Ariz St is impressive too---technically, there is not a of difference in these second tier guys--good in pass pro, need work in the run game.   If we wait until round 2 for an OT, we probably need to sign Nijman and start him early.   I almost think this is what we should do if Lomu is gone.  There is a big dropoff after him, imo, and I think we'd get better value if a stud ILB or edge is there.  Someone like TJ Parker Clemson makes sense. If Lomu is gone, trading back might be the play.  
    • And what is x gunna help with except show him what not to do. Plus for the first year and a half he was just an obstacle 
    • I understand that some people want WR. I am solidly against using yet another high pick there. Coker is pretty good and we used No picks on him.  What I think we really need at WR is a little bit of a Smitty lite. It is ridiculous to say let’s get a Smitty because you just can’t do that, but someone not tall and long striding but more in his mold. I think we’d have a pretty well rounded group.    Looking at tackle, with replacing Moton looming, it just seems like the no brainer.  You fill in Icky short term. Depending on how he recovers, and how the new guy plays, you go from there. A tackle at 19 is most likely either a LOT, a ROT, or a big talented guard, at worst. We will need all three in the next couple of years.  I would love to have a stud ILB be there at 19 but the OL is the responsible thing to do I believe. 
×
×
  • Create New...