Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is the huddle being overly moderated?

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

Is the huddle overly moderated  

169 members have voted

  1. 1. Is the huddle overly moderated

    • Yes
      47
    • No
      74
    • My god you are sexay
      23
    • what does moderated mean?
      25

Recommended Posts

mantal Newbie

mantal

Posted
Posted

I'm not sure if I get what you're asking - but no sucks is a common word so no, don't think there's anything wrong with that word used on this forum. However - kids saying it - that's a big no. In another thread in regards to infractions, I also talked about the silly way they are used using like or dislike towards various condiments, TV shows, or anything derogatory said about Dale Earnhardt. Hmsmike is the one who chose the word "suck"

Well I'm sure that Dale Earnhardt sucked on a daily basis. Most of us do. Ever tried to drink from a water bottle, a soda fountain soda, etc., without doing it?...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

It's probably under "moderated" for the less educated, and over "moderated" for the more educated. In other words, A-holes seem to get a lot of latitude by mods (and huddlers alike), and reasonable people get illegitimately reeled in with the riffraff.

Other than that:

-More consistency and equity would be nice.

-Mods need to get on the same page as best they can.

-ALL involved need to realize that just because a thread walks like a duck, and quack likes a duck, doesn't necessarily mean that it's a duck. Message boards, by their very nature, will contain threads pertaining to the same subject. But, at many times, the discussions will have nuances that are not necessarily apparent to those whose sole purpose seems to be to scream "bloody murder", call for the guillotine, and/or get their hatchets out before they actually read and think about the topic at hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Go To Girl Newbie

Go To Girl

Posted
Posted

Well I'm sure that Dale Earnhardt sucked on a daily basis. Most of us do. Ever tried to drink from a water bottle, a soda fountain soda, etc., without doing it?...

I'm not the one who has a problem or infatuation with Dale so whether he sucked or not is of no consequence to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By TD alt · Posted

      Yep, like I said, I don't mind guaranteeing them money, but make the contracts smaller amounts in order to minimize cap implications. I don't know about "half," the actual amounts, whether more or less than half, would have to be determined by the NFL and NFLPA (which will probably be highly contentious, if not "impossible").  I'm just for whatever leads to the best product on the field while also unaffecting my wallet. As an aside, the NFL owners are greedy bastards in my estimation. They're trying to keep a larger portion of the pie, but players' agents are greedy as well, and they've sewn seeds of greed among the players. It's not all their fault; we all know what our society has evolved into, but the NFL wants a bigger piece of our smaller pocketbooks and refuses to "negotiate" with us (that's why we don't have cheaper and more reasonable à la carte options to view games that they're gradually trying to migrate to paid TV), so fu<k 'em. And then on top of that we have guys trying to water down the product even more by feeding greed. Change the way things are done so that we can at least see players prove themselves on the field without throwing wrenches into the engine that pays guys that have proven they can play on a pro level.
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      So if one of the parents wants to buy the theatre group or the band lunch they should get banned?
    • TD alt
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By TD alt · Posted

      OK, I didn't realize this was about high school, but...if I'm spending my personal money trying to help some kids out, then no one is going to tell me how to spend my money. I get enough of the government spending my money--allocating my tax dollars--to children who don't really need anything, and now they're trying to tell me how to spend my personal money? Sure, there are many other issues to consider and rabbit holes that we could go down due to ethical concerns because it concerns kids, and the need for transparency is extremely important, but maybe as opposed to trying to stop kids from benefitting in darkness, we need to open up the blinds (and blinders) a little bit so that they can benefit in the light. I get where you're coming from, but this is a loaded and layered issue, and I'm just trying to give you some food for thought. 
×
×
  • Create New...