Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BPA: Too Much Value to Trade Down


Your Pick at 8  

69 members have voted

  1. 1. If a trade down offer is not attractive enough to accept, which player that REALISTICALLY should be available at 8 is such a compelling value (clear BPA) that you would select?



Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, bythenbrs said:

Ward, Hunter, Carter are off the board.  The poll assumes that any on the list are still available at 8.

The list is incomplete without knowing the first 7 picks. You are asking me to only pick from the players on your list. That's just another way of saying who I want from only this group. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

The list is incomplete without knowing the first 7 picks. You are asking me to only pick from the players on your list. That's just another way of saying who I want from only this group. 

Unfortunately, I cannot change the poll at this point.  Who did I overlook that you would have included in the list?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bythenbrs said:

Unfortunately, I cannot change the poll at this point.  Who did I overlook that you would have included in the list?

The list is too long. You are assuming none of those guys will go before our pick. If you know all of them will be available then who was selected over them and why? I'm not trying to bust your balls here. I think if you want to play this game you have to commit to who's going in the first 7 picks so we have to do some work. I may not want any of these guys and go in a completely different direction. Then again, I'm a little tipsy and it's not even 7 pm yet.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flame me all you want but Warren or Jeanty would be absolute difference makers on a team that has had the worst offense in the league over the last 5 seasons or so. If we went super heavy on defense the rest of the draft I wouldn’t be upset in the slightest. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Needs context. If I can trade back with the cowboys and pick up an extra second this year and third next year I’m doing it. If I need to trade to late 20s for only next years first for a team that will be picking low again next year prob not 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You don't have to go through every game and point it out as we are discussing his GWDs. You specifically called out that he had GWDs because he is the reason the team is always playing from behind. We looked at those eight games and only Miami stands out as one where he put the team in a hole to begin with. You've added the Atlanta game where the team didn't score a TD but only kicked field goals. You're not trying to change what we're discussing to fit your feelings re: Bryce. That's not necessary. We are discussing GWDs per the thread topic. We have also shown that your opinion that the team has had to always come back due to Bryce was proven to be false as was the claim that "minus one game" was his fault. Appealing to emotion afterwards by trying to broadly paint the rest of the losses in the same way just doesn't work. Where in the Hell did you get that the entire point is the suggestion that BY is more clutch than Jake and/or Cam? It's giving something to be positive about in that Bryce has shown the ability to comeback and win games despite the calamity that might have taken place to put them behind to begin with. How is that blasphemy?
    • His run blocking is making up for his negatives in pass blocking right now.  He’ll still have pass blocking hiccups, but if they think he’s a critical part to the locker room and team construction, you probably re-sign him and try not to overpay.
    • Callahan is gone McDaniel and Taylor are happening Stefanski is a growing possibility. I mean, they need to get an offense going eventually.  Could see Morris as a surprise one.
×
×
  • Create New...