Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kansas City is a JOKE

hepcat

By hepcat,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted

http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/_/name/kc/kansas-city-chiefs

They played the NFC West along with playing in the AFC West, an already pretty horrible division. KC didn't play one team worth a sh!t this year besides Indianapolis, who took a step back this year and is scrambling to make the playoffs in the final week. That's the luckiest schedule I've ever seen. Of course a mediocre team could scrape out 10 wins with that plate of games. No way Todd Haley deserves to be Coach of the Year.

I expect KC to be murdered by whoever they play...Jets, Ravens or Steelers.

And we are griping about the NFC West being the worst division in football. AFC West is a very close second. KC just didn't suck AS bad as the rest of the teams in those divisions. If the Rams didn't have to play the NFC South and get beat down by the Saints and Falcons, they'd have the same record as KC with the privilege of playing teams like the Broncos and Raiders. Rant off.

NFL Playoffs should let in the teams with the best records, regardless of division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bleys Newbie

bleys

Posted
Posted

I would take their FO and coaching staff in a fuging second...

they might not be there yet, but KC will be causing these threads to eat crow in a couple years..

They are the next Texans, but it'll be interesting to see if they can change the attitude in KC to a "winning attitude".. that's the Texans downfall..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
theyhateme45 Newbie

theyhateme45

Posted
Posted

http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/_/name/kc/kansas-city-chiefs

They played the NFC West along with playing in the AFC West, an already pretty horrible division. KC didn't play one team worth a sh!t this year besides Indianapolis, who took a step back this year and is scrambling to make the playoffs in the final week. That's the luckiest schedule I've ever seen. Of course a mediocre team could scrape out 10 wins with that plate of games. No way Todd Haley deserves to be Coach of the Year.

I expect KC to be murdered by whoever they play...Jets, Ravens or Steelers.

And we are griping about the NFC West being the worst division in football. AFC West is a very close second. KC just didn't suck AS bad as the rest of the teams in those divisions. If the Rams didn't have to play the NFC South and get beat down by the Saints and Falcons, they'd have the same record as KC with the privilege of playing teams like the Broncos and Raiders. Rant off.

NFL Playoffs should let in the teams with the best records, regardless of division.

You just kind of contradicted your point in that paragraph.

According to you Kansas City played a Easy schedule therefore they have won all the games they did...

A team maybe better than that who has a worst record, but played a tougher schedule...

Letting the teams with the best record go means Kansas City will go and not the team who actually played a tougher schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Boltergeist Newbie

Boltergeist

Posted
Posted

I expect KC to be murdered by whoever they play...Jets, Ravens or Steelers.

I'll agree with on about BAL and PIT, but I think they could take the Jets in the WC game. Even if KC has a short stay in the playoffs, they've got the foundation to be a playoff contender. With Cassel, Charles, Bowe, and Moeaki - they're in a good place with their skill guys on O. Hali, Johnson, Berry are a very good place to start with their D. KC should be a factor in the West for the foreseeable future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

I'll agree with on about BAL and PIT, but I think they could take the Jets in the WC game. Even if KC has a short stay in the playoffs, they've got the foundation to be a playoff contender. With Cassel, Charles, Bowe, and Moeaki - they're in a good place with their skill guys on O. Hali, Johnson, Berry are a very good place to start with their D. KC should be a factor in the West for the foreseeable future.

I'd add McCluster, Flowers, & especially Derrick Johnson to that list

KC has a young, fast, and talented team. If they can keep it up, they could be really hard to beat in a year or 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frash.exe Apprentice

frash.exe

Posted
Posted

http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/_/name/kc/kansas-city-chiefs

They played the NFC West along with playing in the AFC West, an already pretty horrible division. KC didn't play one team worth a sh!t this year besides Indianapolis, who took a step back this year and is scrambling to make the playoffs in the final week. That's the luckiest schedule I've ever seen. Of course a mediocre team could scrape out 10 wins with that plate of games. No way Todd Haley deserves to be Coach of the Year.

I expect KC to be murdered by whoever they play...Jets, Ravens or Steelers.

And we are griping about the NFC West being the worst division in football. AFC West is a very close second. KC just didn't suck AS bad as the rest of the teams in those divisions. If the Rams didn't have to play the NFC South and get beat down by the Saints and Falcons, they'd have the same record as KC with the privilege of playing teams like the Broncos and Raiders. Rant off.

NFL Playoffs should let in the teams with the best records, regardless of division.

but their the best running team in the league so that means according to the other half of this board they're most likely to win the superbowl

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rmoneyg35 Proficient

rmoneyg35

Posted
Posted

I don't understand why Charlie Weiss would leave a pro team for a college team. Is KC that bad? I would like to congratulate the Chiefs for the season they have had. Sure their schedule might of been bad but this team has sucked for years and their team isn't that bad and they have good coaches and a young team which could dominate the west for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • kungfoodude
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • tukafan21
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...