Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So do we bring Moore back?


Squirrel

Recommended Posts

I don't think we do. I look for us to bring in a vet FA to compete with Jimmy. If Clausen fails would you be comfortable with Moore as your best backup? A possibility would be if the experience that Vince Young just went through humbles him, I wouldn't be opposed to V Young if he's released. (don't want if it's part of a trade) And if they did that there would have to be strict provisions in his contract regarding his character. There are others I'm sure but VY was the first one to come to mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luck and Harbaugh was the answer, folks!

Great to see that ownership is willing to invest in the team!

Hopefully all of you with tickets are smart enough to return the favor to Mr Richardson in not continuing to attend the games. Empty seats will send a message.

Luck wants to remain in school, with the high chance of his coach returning...and you some how blame richardson.

You are a fuging idiot.

In response to the thread..yes, bring back Moore, sign a good vet, open competition. The best man wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, but I'm sure CRA will disagree

disagree with what? I don't think our depth chart will be Moore/Clausen/Pike (order doesn't matter).

New coach is going to make sure things change on that front. I would be fine with everyone being cut (that won't happen) but it wouldn't bother me. There will be a new offense so there is no advantage they will have over new guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • "If only Bryce were <height>", he'd <insert stupid thing here>" was the bit and in direct response to multiple posters ridiculously blaming Bryce (and only Bryce) for the punt returns vs. New England. :3 I understand that folks desire balance, hence the "Bryce stans vs. Bryce haters" narrative but it's abundantly clear that the only people going into threads just to talk about Bryce are the haters. Meanwhile, daring to disagree that Bryce was completely at fault for something that happened on special teams gets the "stan" label. Shoot, I'm sure folks lump me in as a Bryce stan (Brycen stan? Absolutely. Bryce stan? Nah) just because I have the audacity to look at what the rest of the team is and isn't doing. 😛  
    • PJ Walker is the only QB in the Tepper era the Panthers managed to find wins with.  Only QB w/ a winning record.    PJ had success in pro ball before the Panthers.  He he had NFL tools.    He just is consistent and unreliable.  PJ Walker is what you call a bad/poor man's gunslinger.  He can provide highs and lows both virtually guaranteed.  He is NFL depth.  Bryce Young hasn't proven to improve a teams chances of winning better than the PJ Walker tier of QBing. PJ Walker can do things Bryce Young can't......and that a problem     
    • There isn’t but the thing is the team/system/staff around the QB ultimately dictates how successful that QB can be. You have Baker getting released midseason here vs playing like a MVP on another team. Darnold on the Jets/Panthers vs Vikings/Seahawks. Geno Smith on the Jets vs the Seahawks vs the Raiders. Mac Jones is looking as good as Purdy on the 49ers. You have to build a roster, culture, and system for these guys.  Obviously the QB has to be the leader and help elevate the team, but we are seeing what moving a “bad” QB to a stable franchise looks like. Daniel Jones might be doing the same but it’s too early to tell. 
×
×
  • Create New...