Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you think Rivera would have started Weinke in 2002?


Cyberjag

Recommended Posts

This thought just occurred to me.

Rivera wants an innovative OC. He wants someone who will do more than score just enough to win, if the defense can get it's job done. This is in stark contrast to John Fox.

When Fox arrived in Carolina, his plan was to shore up the defense and then address the offense. As a stop-gap measure, he went out and got a strong game manager in Rodney Peete. Peete had been a great QB at one time, but at this point in his career all he could be counted on to do was take care of the ball and run a conservative offense. And the Panthers rode the defense to a 7-9 record that year.

So consider what Rivera may have done differently. From the sound of things, he's not interested in going conservative on offense while he tries to build a dominant defense, a la Fox. He wants to throw a lot (why hire Chud otherwise?), and he wants to be out of the box.

So are you expecting a Rodney Peete repeat, or would he have gone with Weinke another year, just to see what he could do with a little more freedom?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thought just occurred to me.

Rivera wants an innovative OC. He wants someone who will do more than score just enough to win, if the defense can get it's job done. This is in stark contrast to John Fox.

When Fox arrived in Carolina, his plan was to shore up the defense and then address the offense. As a stop-gap measure, he went out and got a strong game manager in Rodney Peete. Peete had been a great QB at one time, but at this point in his career all he could be counted on to do was take care of the ball and run a conservative offense. And the Panthers rode the defense to a 7-9 record that year.

So consider what Rivera may have done differently. From the sound of things, he's not interested in going conservative on offense while he tries to build a dominant defense, a la Fox. He wants to throw a lot (why hire Chud otherwise?), and he wants to be out of the box.

So are you expecting a Rodney Peete repeat, or would he have gone with Weinke another year, just to see what he could do with a little more freedom?

The thing to take into account this year is how much is the decision-making up to Rivera and how much is it Hurney. Remember in the press conference Richardson made a point to say in the past we asked the coaches what they needed and this year we are telling them what we need.

So the question is how receptive are they to getting someone in the draft or free agency versus sticking with Clausen and Pike and bringing in guys who can develop them into a franchise quarterback.

I think Rivera defintely plans on bringing in a QB to provide competition and said so in his press conference. The question is really who is in charge of the decisions at this point. It is shared like under Fox or has Hurney taken a bigger role in dictating FA and the draft??

I figure Chud's first job will be evaluating the roster and making recommendations for free agency and the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

another thing to think about is that rivera also said he wants defense to be his teams calling card. i expect some competition at qb, most likely thru free agency. chud's job is to create ways to run or pass the ball out of multiple formations & personnel. hopefully this makes us less predictable & more exciting(& produce more points)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thought just occurred to me.

Rivera wants an innovative OC. He wants someone who will do more than score just enough to win, if the defense can get it's job done. This is in stark contrast to John Fox.When Fox arrived in Carolina, his plan was to shore up the defense and then address the offense. As a stop-gap measure, he went out and got a strong game manager in Rodney Peete. Peete had been a great QB at one time, but at this point in his career all he could be counted on to do was take care of the ball and run a conservative offense. And the Panthers rode the defense to a 7-9 record that year.

So consider what Rivera may have done differently. From the sound of things, he's not interested in going conservative on offense while he tries to build a dominant defense, a la Fox. He wants to throw a lot (why hire Chud otherwise?), and he wants to be out of the box.

So are you expecting a Rodney Peete repeat, or would he have gone with Weinke another year, just to see what he could do with a little more freedom?

when did he say all of this?

from what I heard he said he wanted to be balanced. I still expect us to run the ball and play good defense. I think some times people read way to much into what Rivera says because at one time Fox said the same things.lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He used the words innovative in his first press conference to describe the offense he wants to run. I think I may have inferred the part about doing more than scoring just enough to win, or got it from JR's comments.

I also think I bungled the original question. In 2002 do you think he have gone more for a Tony Banks type (not great, but potential) and planned for competition with Weinke, or would he have gone with Peete to let Weinke sit for however long he needed to?

Oh, and check Chud's playcalling in Cleveland. VERY pass-heavy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will not be shocked to see Billy Volek in training camp. What that means, I don't know, but I do know that he has stated that he would at least like to compete for a starting gig, and that ain't happenin in SD.

If Chud runs Norvs O, and I suspect that he will run a version, Volek could be the stop gap starter for this team, better or worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He used the words innovative in his first press conference to describe the offense he wants to run. I think I may have inferred the part about doing more than scoring just enough to win, or got it from JR's comments.

I also think I bungled the original question. In 2002 do you think he have gone more for a Tony Banks type (not great, but potential) and planned for competition with Weinke, or would he have gone with Peete to let Weinke sit for however long he needed to?

Oh, and check Chud's playcalling in Cleveland. VERY pass-heavy.

I think the offense will play to its personnel at first and over time get players to fit what they want to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's clear they are going to make Clausen compete for the job this year and Rivera will go with whomever wins that competition.

Agreed, and I think the competition will be a vet. We've already got enough youngsters.

when did he say all of this?

from what I heard he said he wanted to be balanced. I still expect us to run the ball and play good defense. I think some times people read way to much into what Rivera says because at one time Fox said the same things.lol

Cyberjag's actually right. he did say he wanted to be innovative and attacking on offense.

As to his use of the word "balanced" he explained further that what he meant by that wasn't a 50-50 run/pass distribution. He wants the offense to be equally capable of passing and running so that they're free to attack opponents in whatever way works best. In short, we dictate the game rather than just reacting to the opponents.

As far as taking what Rivera says seriously, I do for one reason. His history backs it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Another layer to that is Ive seen Seattle has been in the market for CB help this off-season.   Michael had a higher PFF grade than Horn who got 15 games this season. He wants to be here too, that's a huge bonus for any 5 win team that had awful pass rush.  The 7th rounder Michael Barrett didn't last long on Seattle, he was cut before the season I think and ended up on browns PS. He's already been on 5.......5 teams within one year.......
    • You have gave the board some recent gold via posting. Heres my poor attempt at the truthful play-by-play of the time during post- I pulled out the old laptop to do my shitposting and check on websites. Open the huddle and see this new thread. Open thread and read CRAs post, {inner thinking, oooOOooo this is my lane and I got this}. Make sure not to scroll even to the 2nd post. 23% of current neurons still firing start up and two names appear- Captain and Josh....... about another 43 seconds past "O GOD" it's July 4th weekend and I got medicine to pick up. (If the laptop didn't give away my aging, the meds should...) I need to split, think long panther careers and the hint-  Ryan Kalil was a late 2nd and Pro bowls(even all-pros too) he's got to be OLman and Mikie Minter is among the all-time Panthers career leaders. Drop my post. Scramble to get keys, wallet, and phone. Check my phone- its 17% battery.....fug I now have to raw dog the pickup line and put the phone on charge.... Flip flops, sweat ringed filled hat, and shades acquired. Get in my pos rav4 and think about not running the A/C. Pull out the drive way and reach the 1st stop light, A/C is wide open. I check my shirt to see if there's any new stains on my house shirt, bush off the Bojangles salt that I see.... Neurons re-fire and focus on the comments CRA made that no one would get this....... Dang IT, that means it isn't Ryan Kalil or Mike Minter! CVS is close, but I know its impossible I get back withing 10 minutes to change my post and my phone is on the charger. {Think you monkey, at one point you were a draft nerd}. Reach the CVS line, by some grace its not 5 cars deep during 5 o'clock traffic hell. Im second in line after the car in front of me both turn in, they have to go back and forth to line up while Im a pro for that geometry. Neurons finally reach peak performance as Ive re-thought draft classes. Think obscure and unknown 7th rounders with long careers. Some Sunday/Monday night member berry fell out of my Melon, Will montgomery during the players intros for washington. I thought he out of the league and was shocked to see him still playing around the 2015 years. I do a goggle background check and that refreshed memory. Pick up the meds and enjoy the sweet smelling cool CVS air. Driving back and check in on one of the local bums at the big stop light, wow he's got a new fancy rug. Think about all the old food I got and need to start giving it away and rethink it. Reach home and post a follow up and I know Minter is wrong too, I check the draft history and see Robert Mcclain. Too late, but that would have been my guess....open CRAs link and get "upset" at the DBs name.    
    • THANKS my guy! Keeping up with this threads theme, if I view a thread and there's only 20 posts and some time passes. If I see there's one new post and read the name; @Dave Gettleman's Shortsis among the chosen few that I will reopen that thread just to see what you posted.    Thanks again, plus not just a scout, thats scotty mccloughans son?!?!? If not for the deep claws of booze, scotty is among the best talent finders this league has recently had. Last I heard he ran a consulting business. Caden could be one of those who's on a early path to being a GM in the future. I was a big fan of his dad, dam shame about booze demon ruining his career.    
×
×
  • Create New...