Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dolphins targeting DWill

GentlemanJack

By GentlemanJack,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

GentlemanJack Newbie

GentlemanJack

Posted
Posted

Just saw that the phins are making signing dWill a top priority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SpeedOFLight Collaborator

SpeedOFLight

Posted
Posted

I really hope we can keep DWill. He his a great back. I would love to keep Double Trouble locked up for a long time. As far as Goodson, if his stock raised because of a few performances and someone reaches out, I say send him. I am not sold on him plus he is not a complete back like the other two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tondi Newbie

tondi

Posted
Posted

I guess we'll have to wait if the new CBA allows for sign and trades. I would certainly give him up for a 2nd rounder instead of overpaying him but I don't know if we will even have the option of trading him should we decide to resign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

shoulda traded him while we had the chance. If we dont resign him it will be a total absolute marty hurney failure.

we would have to tag and trade him......

Carolina could get screwed and be forced to use that tag on someone like Kalil......and DeAngelo walks like Pep. A valuable and top tier guy that Carolina gets squat for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jon Snow
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Jon Snow · Posted

      I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...