Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Rosario be our F-Back?


Snake

Recommended Posts

I've never been even remotely impressed with Rosario's blocking. I'd rather not depend on him as a lead blocker.

Valid point, though "F-Back" in this system isn't quite a traditional fullback, if that's what you're thinking. It's more of just another word for "H-Back".

Hoover would have been a good choice for a lot like that a few years back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm assuming your talking more of an H-Back ala Cooley in Washington. I'm not sure he's really physical enough to be much more than a strictly pass catching TE.

H-back is used more for blocking then a F-back is. We used H-backs all the time with Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

H-back is used more for blocking then a F-back is. We used H-backs all the time with Fox.

More so under Henning than Davidson though. Henning was a Coryell guy.

One of the big deals on this offense will be creating mismatches as much as possible. If you think Rosario is capable of that, he's your guy.

(jury's still out for me)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More so under Henning than Davidson though. Henning was a Coryell guy.

One of the big deals on this offense will be creating mismatches as much as possible. If you think Rosario is capable of that, he's your guy.

(jury's still out for me)

Well I am not saying he is great but he has solid hands and speed. His blocking is not as bad as everyone makes out either. For that position I think he is the most complete. Barndige is weak at blocking and king is to slow to line up at WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
    • The Giants, Cardinals  and Dolphins should have moved on, but they didn't and ended up cutting their QB early into a monster second contract and had to eat a TON of dead cap money.
×
×
  • Create New...