Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Rosario be our F-Back?


Snake

Recommended Posts

I've never been even remotely impressed with Rosario's blocking. I'd rather not depend on him as a lead blocker.

Valid point, though "F-Back" in this system isn't quite a traditional fullback, if that's what you're thinking. It's more of just another word for "H-Back".

Hoover would have been a good choice for a lot like that a few years back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm assuming your talking more of an H-Back ala Cooley in Washington. I'm not sure he's really physical enough to be much more than a strictly pass catching TE.

H-back is used more for blocking then a F-back is. We used H-backs all the time with Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

H-back is used more for blocking then a F-back is. We used H-backs all the time with Fox.

More so under Henning than Davidson though. Henning was a Coryell guy.

One of the big deals on this offense will be creating mismatches as much as possible. If you think Rosario is capable of that, he's your guy.

(jury's still out for me)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More so under Henning than Davidson though. Henning was a Coryell guy.

One of the big deals on this offense will be creating mismatches as much as possible. If you think Rosario is capable of that, he's your guy.

(jury's still out for me)

Well I am not saying he is great but he has solid hands and speed. His blocking is not as bad as everyone makes out either. For that position I think he is the most complete. Barndige is weak at blocking and king is to slow to line up at WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...