Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PANTHERS @ HURRICANES ROUND 3 GAME 1


Recommended Posts

Need to make a statement Tuesday!!! Florida has one day in between road trips Toronto to Raleigh they won't be back in Florida.... need to come out and punch them in the mouth. This isn't the soft and injured Canes of yesteryear! #TakeWarning #CauseChaos #Wearethestorm

 

Screenshot_20250518_221937_X.jpg

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PNW_PantherMan said:

I just hope Bob doesn’t go super human and stand on his head.  I think our team has a good chance.

This will be a low scoring affair on both sides IMO. 

Let's not forget last time we were a much smaller team and Martinook was our leading goal scorer lol.

 

Two goals probably wins most of these games.

 

Canes are much more physical now and have more size than years past.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I just hope Bob doesn’t go super human and stand on his head.  I think our team has a good chance.

I just hope our team doesnt have periods where they look stupid af.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

I just hope our team doesnt have periods where they look stupid af.

That's the ebbs and flows of hockey man as long as it isn't a meltdown on the score board just power through....

 

This will be a very gritty low scoring and physical affair.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Stankoven and Marchand will be a good matchup to watch.  Stankoven reminds me a lot of the rat.

Svechnikov vs Thachuk

Staal vs Bennet 

I agree on that one but have a feeling it will be Jarvy going agaist the rat

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

I hate the new start times at 8. Why!?

Fewer games, less need to have a late start, more time for people to finish dinner and catch the game (though I am going to miss the first period every time because my kids go down at 8 so bedtime routine is either flexing to 730 or I just miss puck drops lol)

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, lightsout said:

Fewer games, less need to have a late start, more time for people to finish dinner and catch the game (though I am going to miss the first period every time because my kids go down at 8 so bedtime routine is either flexing to 730 or I just miss puck drops lol)

It sucks. Ive talked to many people trying to get them into hockey. One of the biggest reasons is the length of the season, which I agree I think it could be cut down at least 20 games. Another is availability. You HAVE to have fanduel south to watch the Canes and then Youtube TV when they make it past round 1. These starting times dont help either. All NHL needs to do is a few tweaks to make the NHL more popular. Availability should be top priority. Its absolutely insane we are forced to purchase multiple services to watch our teams.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...