Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes got booed off the ice

Panthers Fan 69

By Panthers Fan 69,
in Carolina Hurricanes

 Share

Recommended Posts

Kuhndog94 Grand Master

Kuhndog94

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, lightsout said:

We will see tomorrow night if Rod and the team received the message. If we're heavily out shot again and not getting pucks on net, I can promise you this series is over. We're not in a spot to win 4 straight 

Perhaps there will be less pressure on the road? 

I don't know. But what we've seen so far is NOT canes hockey. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BIGH2001 Grand Master

BIGH2001

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Kuhndog94 said:

Perhaps there will be less pressure on the road? 

I don't know. But what we've seen so far is NOT canes hockey. 

If it wasn’t obvious already I think it’s pretty clear that we don’t match up well with Florida. They do what we do, only way better. And their coach isn’t an idiot who decides to experiment with his lines and call up minor league prospects deep into the postseason. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherChris Grand Master

PantherChris

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

If it wasn’t obvious already I think it’s pretty clear that we don’t match up well with Florida. They do what we do, only way better. And their coach isn’t an idiot who decides to experiment with his lines and call up minor league prospects deep into the postseason. 

Well he had to use a "call up" so to speak the issue we have is instead of using the consensus #1 defensive *prospect* a guy whose basically a generational type talent he chose to go with Scott Morrow again.... an AHL quality offense only RHD who was party to 4 goals allowed the game before.....

He also strangley chose to bench KK instead of Roslovic.... 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, PantherChris said:

Well he had to use a "call up" so to speak the issue we have is instead of using the consensus #1 defensive *prospect* a guy whose basically a generational type talent he chose to go with Scott Morrow again.... an AHL quality offense only RHD who was party to 4 goals allowed the game before.....

He also strangley chose to bench KK instead of Roslovic.... 

 

That was purely a faceoff circle decision I think 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthers Fan 69 Grand Master

Panthers Fan 69

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

Yeah that worked sooooo well, yep lets lose a far better defender and size matchup for....  2 extra face offs.... and then proceed to lose 10% more face offs than game 1

I love rod but he getting out coached in every way possible. Also, Burns lead all defenders with 28 minutes of ice time?  Why not Slavin?

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherChris Grand Master

PantherChris

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

I love rod but he getting out coached in every way possible. Also, Burns lead all defenders with 28 minutes of ice time?  Why not Slavin?

Even though Morrow ended up with 10 minutes, he basically played 4 d most of the game Walker finished with nine minutes after leaving the game 2 minutes into the second.....

 

Morrow played 5 minutes in the last ten minutes of the third.....

 

WHY WOULD YOU PLAY A GUY ONLY TO BE SO SCARED YOU LEAVE HIM ON THE BENCH EVEN THOUGH YOU ARE DOWN A RIGHT HANDED DEFENSIVE SHOT.....

 

WE PLAYED 4 D BASICALLY HALF THE GAME 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherChris Grand Master

PantherChris

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

I love rod but he getting out coached in every way possible. Also, Burns lead all defenders with 28 minutes of ice time?  Why not Slavin?

Ooooof It took me a second but I just realized why Burns played 28 minutes and its even more of an indictment of his horrid decision making.

BRET BURNS PLAYED 28 MINUTES LAST NIGHT 5 MORE THAN ANY OTHER D MAN.

WALKER LEFT 2 MINUTES INTO THE SECOND AND DID NOT RETURN ROD WITH FIVE HEALTHY DEFENSEMEN LEFT 3 LEFT HAND D AND 2 RIGHT HAND D CHOSE TO KEEP MORROW ON THE BENCH UNTIL WE WERE DOWN 5-0 OPTING TO PLAY 40 YEAR OLD BURNS FOR 28 MINUTES AND PLAYING WITH JUST 4 DEFENSEMEN!!!! BECAUSE 

 

BURNS PLAYED 28 MINUTES BECAUSE ROD WAS TOO SCARED TO PLAY THE GUY HE DRESSED OVER A POTENTIAL GAME CHANGER YOU CANT MAKE THIS poo UP.

Edited by PantherChris
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PantherChris
      PANTHERS @ HURRICANES ROUND 3 GAME 1

      By PantherChris · Posted

      Yep he made the comment " I dont know what they were doing out there at that point" in the press conference. Let's be real they all got paid but they also know his system suppresses there offensive potential.
    • PantherChris
      RODS gotta GO

      By PantherChris · Posted

      Yup the casuals on Facebook ive gotten 85 laughing or angry emojis so far for pointing it out.  The amount of them throwing a fit because the canes were booed is insane  
    • woahfraze
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By woahfraze · Posted

      Why are you so fixated on yards? Even if yards were a good judge of QB play, his low yardage totals in some of those games were partly a function of drops (looking at you Xavier Leggette…).  I’m not advocating that Bryce was elite for the last half of last year, but the eye test certainly supported high level QB play for large stretches. He made a lot of high difficulty, put it on the money/drop in the bucket throws. He converted on 3rd and 4th down, kept drives moving, and put the team in position to win games. And it’s not on him that the defense blew it late after he led game tying drives, Leggette dropped a game winning TD, or Chuba fumbled the ball in OT. We could have finished the season close to .500 with wins against 3 playoff teams including KC and Philly during that stretch largely due to Bryce’s play.    Has he sustained this level of play long enough to deserve an higher ranking? No. But for judging based in that stretch alone, he would. But whether he can perform more consistently at that level or build on that, and thus earns a higher ranking, remains to be seen. 
×
×
  • Create New...