Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2025 College Football Thread


Joe Bear
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, OldhamA said:

Were you sad when Duke stole Mensah from Tulane?

He didn't have a contract in place. Don't blame the players but if they sign a 2 year nil deal other schools should be punished for trying to get them to break it especially last minute like Miami did. It was fuging dirty and so was what ole miss did to Clemson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, toldozer said:

He didn't have a contract in place. Don't blame the players but if they sign a 2 year nil deal other schools should be punished for trying to get them to break it especially last minute like Miami did. It was fuging dirty and so was what ole miss did to Clemson

So the answer is no. You weren't sad when Duke tampered with Mensah during the season when he was at Tulane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a Duke fan, so I hope he leaves.  That being said, I am glad Duke is suing him.  If you sign a contract, both sides should have to honor it.  And there should be penalties if said contract is not honored.  

And I don't really blame Miami that much.  This is mostly on Mensah.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Not a Duke fan, so I hope he leaves.  That being said, I am glad Duke is suing him.  If you sign a contract, both sides should have to honor it.  And there should be penalties if said contract is not honored.  

And I don't really blame Miami that much.  This is mostly on Mensah.  

Dude is what, 20 years olds. The adults in the room should be held accountable not the kids. He is getting an extra 2 million dollars plus they are paying his sister and I believe he is getting a deal with adidas too. I don't blame the player one bit for taking the most money he can get. The schools should be held to a higher standard than a child.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, HPPantherzfan said:

Mensah was not under any NIL contract at Tulane.  There was no stealing, he entered the transfer portal free and clear of any contract.  Not even comparable to what Miami is doing 

What is an NIL contract?

These are not paid employees - and college teams absolutely don't want them to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Not a Duke fan, so I hope he leaves.  That being said, I am glad Duke is suing him.  If you sign a contract, both sides should have to honor it.  And there should be penalties if said contract is not honored.  

And I don't really blame Miami that much.  This is mostly on Mensah.  

Mensah's side have come to a settlement with Duke - as was always going to be the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/29/2026 at 8:00 AM, toldozer said:

Dude is what, 20 years olds. The adults in the room should be held accountable not the kids. He is getting an extra 2 million dollars plus they are paying his sister and I believe he is getting a deal with adidas too. I don't blame the player one bit for taking the most money he can get. The schools should be held to a higher standard than a child.

I completely disagree.  If one is 20 years old and doesn't have the sense to understand what a contract is, shouldn't be signing them. And from what I understand, these guys have agents advising them.  

Once the contract is signed, both the school and the individual signing should be bound by it as long as it follows the law.  Otherwise, what is the point of the contract?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I completely disagree.  If one is 20 years old and doesn't have the sense to understand what a contract is, shouldn't be signing them. And from what I understand, these guys have agents advising them.  

Once the contract is signed, both the school and the individual signing should be bound by it as long as it follows the law.  Otherwise, what is the point of the contract?

I'd say to keep other teams from poaching the player. As a player I don't know why they would sign a two year deal though unless they don't think they're very good. In the NFL you have 31 other suiters in free agency and they have salary caps. Ncaa you have 100+ and no rules on how much they can spend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

And Duke had a contract and Miami poached him anyway.  

If I were this kids parent, I would be very disappointed in him for signing then breaking a contract, even if it got him more money.  

If my kid turned 4 million into 6 plus an endorsement deal and got his sisters college paid for and her some nil money I can't say I would scold him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

If I were this kids parent, I would be very disappointed in him for signing then breaking a contract, even if it got him more money.  

I think that's unfair without knowing all the circumstances.

Besides just the money, there are a ton of other variables.  I hate Dook, it's an incredible school, I'd actually send my son there to get an education over Carolina if we had those options, even as a Tarheel fan. 

But if my son was a pretty good QB and we had to choose between Dook and Miami, it's a no-brainer, even if we have to break a few eggs to make the omelet. 

Dook's schedule next year includes, @Miami, @NC State, @Illinois, @Virginia and vs Clemson.  That's 5 games where Dook will be an underdog, even if Mensah stayed.  Mix in at least one random road loss (ie. Connecticut this year) and they are staring a 6-6 or 7-5 season in the face.  Even if they went 9-3, there would be no postseason, probably one (if any) nationally televised games, and zero national media coverage of the Dook football program.  The only reason anyone knew about them this year was because the ACC was so laughably bad that a 5-loss team won its Championship game and was preposterously arguing they should be in the CFP.

Miami offers so much more...  

1) Money - not just NIL, but local endorsements, celebrities, appearances, etc.  Durham has 1/100th of opportunities he'll have to make money.  And as a kid who doesn't appear to be destined to be an NFL starter ever, if I'm his parents, I'm telling him to make as much money as he can while the iron is hot.

2) The visibility to be on TV and playing for a team that will start the season in the top 10 and be featured and talked about, because everyone agrees that college football is better when Da U is relevant, even when they stink.  The ACC will be dogshit again.  There is no reason he can't go 11-1 at Miami, with the lone game where they may be dogs is @ Notre Dame. 

3) The availability of ex-NFL players who ALL come back to Da U and can offer guidance on how to prepare for the NFL and leverage their pull with NFL teams and employees. 

4) It's also a really good school, although we're kidding ourselves if we think these kids are going to classes.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HeelsPanthersCanes said:

I think that's unfair without knowing all the circumstances.

 

 

I don't.  Unless Duke did something dirty or illegal, then I don't know what circumstances would change my mind.  Maybe if the kid had a family member in the hospital, and they needed the extra money to pay the bill, that might mitigate it.  Barring that, its just he got more money at a better football school.  

To me, this isn't about Miami or Duke (and fwiw, I am glad Duke took a hit).  Its about doing due diligence prior to making a choice, and then once the choice is made and the document is signed, you stick to it.  

I would guarantee that if some kid had done this exact same thing to Miami, most Miami fans would be up in arms about it.  

I encourage all these young men to fully explore all the options, and sign the deal that is best for them.  But once its signed, honor it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...