Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I’m trying to be positive on Bryce Young, but….


LegioX
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, frankw said:

Also here's some convo on Baker Mayfield's arm strength well before the Panthers got to him.

Trying to compare him to Bryce Young is peak cope.

https://www.reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/nwzx16/baker_mayfield_has_one_of_the_strongest_arms_the/

Who is comparing the two QB’s as football players? They’re completely different QB’s

i said before Baker got here that he could play but the huddle swore up and down he was the worst ever 

Bryce very similar right now. Bryce out there with a bunch of guys that’ll be out of the league in a few years minus TMac.

And given this thread is about the 4th and 1 play specifically well it was actually TMac that butchered the entire play by running the wrong route 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Who is comparing the two QB’s as football players? They’re completely different QB’s

i said before Baker got here that he could play but the huddle swore up and down he was the worst ever 

Bryce very similar right now. Bryce out there with a bunch of guys that’ll be out of the league in a few years minus TMac.

And given this thread is about the 4th and 1 play specifically well it was actually TMac that butchered the entire play by running the wrong route 

If you want to discuss the pieces around them and the coaching that's one thing. The aspect that cannot be disputed is they are night and day in terms of physical attributes. When defenses play Bryce Young they have everything on tape. They do not respect his arm. Can we just exist within this realm of reality for a moment and acknowledge that? It is the opposite for Mayfield. Baker has always had a tendency to make boneheaded decisions although he seems to have improved that significantly. But defenses always had to account for his arm. It was the same for Sam Darnold. Sam could throw a laser. Sometimes it would be pinpoint accurate. And other times it would be a horrible decision into double or triple coverage. But again defenses had to account for his arm. With Bryce they can cheat coverages. We are seeing what should be routine throws turning into constant 50/50 balls. And throws to the sideline? Forget it. High and out of bounds and that has been the story throughout Bryce Young's career so far. His arm talent is miniscule. It just is what it is unfortunately. But we knew what we were getting. We cannot claim ignorance.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

Bryce can be a great human.  We can also cut him after this year and literally no one should feel bad for him.  Dude is going to walk away with 37 million dollars and his health.   How many humans get 37 mill to be bad at their jobs seasonal job for 3 years.  

Generationally bad at their job. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

the first INT on XL? lol wut?   

I question anyone who watches the balls to Hunter Renfrow Sunday.....and thinks it was a Hunter issue. 

we are also at the point where tough 50/50 balls (like to Saunders) are now deemed layups our guys should get 100% of the time.  They are called 50/50 for a reason. 

We're basically in a situation where those that defend Young are asking our receivers to win all the 50/50 balls - and blaming them when they lose contested catches.

Do you know why our receivers are always having to make contested catches? 'Cos we've got a guy whose ceiling is career backup QB as our starter. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SCO96 said:

Bryce is appears to be a subpar QB, but he isn't a bad person. There's no need to humiliate the guy. I actually feel bad for him. Put yourselves in his position and imagine how much mental anguish he must be experiencing today. Not picking up the 5th year option would send a strong enough message.

 

Fan is short for fanatic.

He absolutely contributes to ruining my enjoyment of the NFL. 

I'm allowed to hate him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, *FreeFua* said:

Basically this entire roster is complete ass outside of a few guys

Horn and I guess DB but he isn’t worth what we’re paying him

On offense it’s the majority of OL minus Corbett. Then Tmac and Bryce

For the 3rd year in a row Bryce has 1 pass catcher he can throw to. Before it was Thielen and now it’s TMac. That’s literally it. This WR room ain’t much if at all better than the one he had his rookie season. Factor in the coaches and GM’s during this time and it’s a complete circus. 

Bryce didn’t even play bad yesterday. The fumble was rough. 4 and 1 play TMac ran wrong route. The two plays before that were completely wasted by Canales. Interception was more on Legette and a great play by safety who knew what was coming. Nijman was Kalil levels bad. 

This board said all the same things about Baker. This organization makes these QB’s look so f’n bad. Whoever we draft next would be wise to say no and deal with whatever repercussions come with that 

I would bet everything I've got in my bank - and hell the deeds to my house - that if you dropped a good NFL QB into this system the O would hum. 

Sanders, Renfrow, Hubbard, Dowdle, Coker (IR yes I know) are not bad players. The OLine is outstanding. 

T-Mac might be a legit #1 WR, but if that's what it takes to haul in Young's passes then we're poo out of luck 'cos there aren't many of those around. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bleacher Report trade and mock has us trading to 9 and picking SG Brayden Burries Charlotte Hornets recieve: Kyrie Irving and No. 9 pick Dallas Mavericks receive: LaMelo Ball, No. 14 pick and No. 18 pick The Hornets just finished their sixth season with Ball. It was only their second with a winning record, their sixth without a playoff trip and the sixth in which someone else paced them in win shares (Kon Knueppel this time around). While they'd surely like to keep building on their second-half momentum, maybe they're just unconvinced that Ball can lead a winning team. Maybe they credit that stretch run less to him and more to the addition of Knueppel, the ascension of Brandon Miller and some out-of-nowhere gains on the defensive end.   Charlotte should be dreaming big right now, and perhaps it believes a steadier hand at point guard is needed to realize that. Or maybe it feels it needs a little more time to bring everything together and thinks that task would be simpler without Ball's money on the books and with a top-10 pick in a loaded draft instead of two selections in the mid-teens.   Either way, this shakeup works. Short-term, a healthy Irving should be far easier to follow than Ball. You may not always know if Irving is playing, but you know what you'll get if he does: elite shotmaking, all-time handles, offensive ingenuity and the ability to work both on and off the ball. He could show this young roster what's required to win for a year or two (he has a $42.4 million player option for 2027-28) or even stick around longer if the partnership proves especially fruitful.   The Hornets also add a building block in Burries, who offers both plug-and-play polish and flashes of shot-creation that hint at star potential. In short, they could better their chances of winning both now and in the future while collecting both the best player in the trade and the highest draft pic
    • I'd hire him in a heartbeat. Hell if he wanted the job, I'd have Canales packing his poo right now and I don't dislike Canales. It's just that firing a 106-58 coach is crazy work. That's a 65% winning percentage. That's the equivalent of averaging 11 wins a season. That's incomprehensible for a fanbase That's never experienced back to back winning seaons.
×
×
  • Create New...