Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Props to the defense


smash_n_dash
 Share

Recommended Posts

Man, if u see a big play... you will see 21  in the frame. If we going 3 safeties,  it needs to be Damani, Trevor and Ransom. All in all, they  feasted up front and I hate to say it but Bobby Brown needs to start and Turk come off the bench. This is 2 times so far that Bobby Started  and its shown better linebacker play, no coincidence. 

Edited by Lurk21
  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lurk21 said:

Man, if u see a big play... you will see 21  in the frame. If we going 3 safeties,  it needs to be Damani, Trevor and Ransom. All in all, they  feasted up front and I hate to say it but Bobby Brown needs to start and Turk come off the bench. This is 2 times so far that Bobby Started  and its shown better linebacker play. 

21 is always out of position. You can count on him giving up every single big play. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lurk21 said:

Man, if u see a big play... you will see 21  in the frame. If we going 3 safeties,  it needs to be Damani, Trevor and Ransom. All in all, they  feasted up front and I hate to say it but Bobby Brown needs to start and Turk come off the bench. This is 2 times so far that Bobby Started  and its shown better linebacker play, no coincidence. 

Hes basically always about 10 yards deeper than he should be.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

Hes basically always about 10 yards deeper than he should be.

Exactly!!! He's going every play like it's a pass play and allowing guards n centers to run up to the next level with ease. He just needs to be our 3rd down rush interior specialist  and sub for relief.  Ohhh my bad... you talking about Scott lol. Yeah he straight garbage. 

Edited by Lurk21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Tyreek is a bad person to play with on the field, for sure not in the same way that Diggs is, as he's a cancer on the field with how he acts, and wouldn't take kindly to being 2nd fiddle behind T-Mac. It's that Tyreek is just a terrible person who realistically shouldn't even be in the NFL, his insane athletic ability is why his off field transgressions have been overlooked.  If he was a WR3, no team would have kept him around, it was only that he was a 1st ballot HOF level talent that kept him around. Just zero interest in having a person like that around our young WRs, that's really all it comes down to for me with him. Again, if we were true contenders this year, that changes things and I'd rather bring in the best possible players and hope it works out.  But they're trying to build something here and to do that, you need high quality people, not just great talent.
    • I think some depth at guard would be nice.  
    • I may no longer have the photo of Sir Purr saved somewhere anymore, as that was taken, uniquely, at an actual game, and sometimes files go missing between computers and phones etc.  That said, I am sure I can find something similar. Maybe even better. Not too worried. I still have regular access to the account email. Change is good.
×
×
  • Create New...